PL EN
Professional burnout of pre-school and early-school teachers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwesytet Jagielloński
 
 
Submission date: 2019-01-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-05-30
 
 
Publication date: 2019-07-24
 
 
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Dziurzyński   

Uniwesytet Jagielloński
 
 
JoMS 2019;41(2):11-38
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of this article is an empirical verification of the problem of burnout of pre-school and early-school education teachers.

Material and methods:
Empirical material, author's material collected on the basis of a survey of 182 people. It consists of 19 questions: five examined the dimension of emotional exhaustion, seven examined the dimension of depersonalization and seven more related to the sense of personal achievement. The teachers surveyed had to refer to a four-step scale (from 1 - completely inappropriate for me to 4 - definitely suitable for me). The second part of the questionnaire was used to measure the level of self-assessment. Self-assessment was measured based on the Polish adaptation of the SES M Self-Assessment Scale. Rosenberg.

Results:
The teachers of pre-school education and early school education were characterized by different levels of professional burnout. The low level of burnout was represented by 29.7% of the respondents, the average by 41.7%, and the high by 28.6%.

Conclusions:
The relation between the level of education (pre-school, early-school), the age of the respondents, their length of service, the level of education and professional burnout does not allow to plot a permanent trend in the studied group, a relation which allows to unambiguously interpret the results obtained. Socio-demographic factors also do not have a high impact on the self-esteem of the studied group of female teachers. There are no noticeable differences between individual subgroups and the index value of the self-assessment variable. The vast majority (72%) of the teachers surveyed achieved average and above-average results in the SES Rosenberg self-assessment test.

REFERENCES (9)
1.
Antczak, B. (2015). Niska frekwencja uczniów jako jedna z przyczyn niepowodzeń szkolnych. Journal of Modern Science, 25(2), 297-311. ISSN 1734-2031.
 
2.
Bedyńska S., Brzezicka A. (red. nauk.)(2007), Statystyczny drogowskaz. Praktyczny poradnik analizy danych w naukach społecznych na przykładach z psychologii, Wydawnictwo SWPS „Akademia”, Warszawa. ISBN 9788389281401.
 
3.
Bedyńska S., Cypryańska M. (red.) (2013), Statystyczny drogowskaz 2. Praktyczne wprowadzenie do analizy wariancji, Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Sedno”, Warszawa. ISBN 9788362443239.
 
4.
Jurzysta, K. (2017). Pedagogika kultury w systemie współczesnej edukacji. Journal of Modern Science, 35(4), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/8.... ISSN 1734-2031.
 
5.
Koseła K., Utzig K. (1980), Skalowanie wielowymiarowe - zastosowania uprawnione i nieuprawnione. Studia Socjologiczne Nr 2. ISSN 0039-3371.
 
6.
Marek T. (1989, Analiza skupień w badaniach empirycznych. Metody SAHN. PWN, Warszawa. ISBN 8301095377.
 
7.
Noworol Cz. (1989), Analiza skupień w badaniach empirycznych. Rozmyte modele hierarchiczne, PWN, Warszawa. ISBN 8301100095.
 
8.
Plichta P. (2015), Wypalenie zawodowe i poczucie sensu życia pedagogów specjalnych, Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe, Wrocław. ISBN 9788379771141.
 
9.
Strzyżewska M., Rószkiewicz M. (2002), Analizy marketingowe. Difin, Warszawa, s. 288. ISBN 837251271X.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top