Objectives:
The purpose of the study is to comprehensively examine the interpretation of cybersex in the context of marital guilt, while assessing the implications and challenges of bringing such evidence to court. The article aims to navigate the interpretation and legal recognition of cybersex as grounds for divorce.

Material and methods:
The study used methods used in legal science: 1) the dogmatic method, referring to the establishment of current legal regulations governing the rules of electronic evidence, including cybersex evidence, as well as the way they are used in divorce processes and their impact on the permanent and complete breakdown of marital relations; it has a dominant character in the study due to the fact that the authors focus on the analysis of current legal regulations, as well as their practical use and application in other countries (e.g., the USA and Canada). 2) The analytical method was applied with reference to the current state of knowledge in the subject area in the body of legal science. 3) The comparative legal method is of complementary importance and relates to the analysis of legal and organizational solutions to the use of so-called illegal evidence, as well as the difficulties of conducting evidence and regulations in other countries. 4) The historical method is related to the evolution of the development of the rules of evidence in civil litigation in view of the development and spread of the use of modern technological solutions in justice.

Results:
The potential use of cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings in Civil Procedure, while complex, provides an opportunity for legal growth.

Conclusions:
Incorporating cybersex evidence in divorce proceedings brings a set of challenges, especially related to the violation of privacy rights, data protection, and the potential for cybercrime.