PRACA ORYGINALNA
The Covid-19 pandemic and social support. Analysis of the impact of lockdowns on intergenerational family ties in European societies
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
 
 
Data nadesłania: 15-11-2023
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 29-04-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 15-05-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 27-06-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Marta Luty-Michalak   

Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
 
 
JoMS 2024;56(2):644-662
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The aim of this article is to answer the question of whether the lockdowns introduced in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on intergenerational family ties in the area of social support in European societies. If so, was the impact positive or negative? Was it more concerned with the support provided to parents or children living separately?

Material and methods:
The analysis used data from representative SHARE Corona Survey 1 and SHARE Corona Survey 2, conducted among respondents aged 50 and over, between June and August 2020 and between June and August 2021.

Results:
The results of the analysis indicate that during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, the frequency of providing assistance in dealing with necessary matters to parents increased in almost all European countries, while assistance provided to children decreased. A similar situation occurred in the case of personal care. During the next spring lockdown in 2021, it was noticeable that there was a greater decrease in both care and frequency of support given to children than to parents.

Conclusions:
The Covid-19 pandemic has undoubtedly had an impact on the frequency of social support provided. In the case of support provided to children, we see a negative impact. However, in the case of parental support, the situation was different. It should be remembered that the respondents are aged 50 and over, and therefore their parents are elderly people who often struggle with health problems and, in many cases, with dependency. This leads to the conclusion that in the case of people requiring support (elderly parents) in the form of assistance in dealing with necessary matters and personal care, the Covid-19 pandemic did not have a negative impact on the strength of intergenerational family ties.

 
REFERENCJE (28)
1.
Abramowska-Kmon, A. et all. (2023). Sytuacja osób w wieku 50+ w Polsce i w Europie w trakcie drugiej fali pandemii COVID-19. Raport z telefonicznego badania ankietowego SHARE Corona 2 zrealizowanego w ramach 9. rundy badania SHARE: 50+ w Europie. Accessed: 08.03.2024 from https://share50plus.pl/sites/s....
 
2.
Bergmann, M., Wagner M. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on informal caregiving and care receiving across Europe during the first phase of the Pandemic, 9, 1-17. Front. Public Health.
 
3.
Bieńko, M. (2006). Nieznośna lekkość więzi w sferze bliskich kontaktów międzyludzkich, 01(1), 105-126. Societas Communitas.
 
4.
Börsch-Supan, A. (2022). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 8. COVID-19 Survey 1. Release version: 8.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set. DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w8ca.800.
 
5.
Börsch-Supan, A. (2022), Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 9. COVID-19 Survey 2. Release version: 8.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set. DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w9ca.800.
 
6.
Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Marcier, J., Tjadens, F. (2011). Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. OECD Health Policy Studies. OECD Publishing.
 
7.
Eggebeen, D. J., Davey, A. (1998). Do safety nets work? The role of anticipated help in times of need, 60 (4), 939-950. Journal of Marriage and the Family.
 
8.
Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., Qin, M., Vlachantoni, A. (2020). Older and ‘staying at home’ during lockdown: Informal care receipt during the COVID-19 pandemic amongst people aged 70 and over in the UK, 1-16 SocArXiv Papers. Access: 22.10.2023 z https://osf.io/preprints/socar....
 
9.
Fingerman, K. L., Miller, L. M., Birditt, K. S., Zarit, S. (2009). Giving to the good and the needy: Parental support of grown children, 71 (5), 1220-1233. Journal of Marriage and Family.
 
10.
Fingerman, K. L., Pitzer, L. M., Chan, W., Birditt, K., Franks, M. M., Zarit, S. (2010). Who gets what and why? Help middle-aged adults provide to parents and grown children. 66B(1), 87–98. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B.
 
11.
Fingerman, K. L., Sechrist, J., Birditt, K. (2013). Changing views on intergenerational ties, 59, 64-70. Gerontology.
 
12.
Furstenberg, F. F. (2000). The sociology of adolescence and youth in the 1990s: A critical commentary, 62 (4), s. 896-910. Journal of Marriage and the Family.
 
13.
Georgas, J., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y. H., Angleitner, A., Goodwin, R., Charalambous, N. (1997). The relationship of family bonds to family structure and function across Cultures, 28 (3), 303-320. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
 
14.
Giza-Poleszczuk, A., Marody M. (2006). W uwięzi więzi (społecznych), 01 (1), 21-48. Societas Communitas.
 
15.
Grundy, E., Henretta J. C. (2006). Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich’ generation. 26 (05), s. 707-722. Ageing and Society.
 
16.
Linek, A. (2023). Connected or set apart? Academic youth about their ties with the mother and the father, 51 (2), 609-626. Journal of Modern Science.
 
17.
Malikowski, M. (1979). Pojęciowo-teoretyczne aspekty kontrowersji wokół istoty więzi społecznej, 4 (75), 5-28. Studia Socjologiczne.
 
18.
Qi, X. (2016). Family bond and family obligation: continuity and transformation, 52 (1), 39-52. Journal of Sociology.
 
19.
Roth, D. L., Fredman, L., Haley, W. E. (2015). Informal caregiving and its impact on health: A reappraisal from population-based studies, 55 (2), 303-331. Gerontologist.
 
20.
Rybicki, P. (1972). Społeczeństwo miejskie. PWN.
 
21.
Scherpenzeel, A., Axt, K., Bergmann, M., Douhou, S., Oepen, A., Sand, G., et al. (2020). Collecting survey data among the 50+ population during the COVID-19 pandem ic: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), 14 (2), s. 217-221. Survey Research Methods.
 
22.
Shapiro, A. (2004). Revisiting the generation gap: Exploring the relationships of parent/adult-child dyads, 58 (2), 127-146. International Journal of Aging and Human Development.
 
23.
Slany, K. (2020). Różnorodność Typów Rodzin, Różnorodność Praktyk w Rodzinach. in: M. Bieńko, M. Rosochacka-Gmitrzak, E. Wideł (eds.), Obrazy Życia Rodzinnego i Intymności, 19-29. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
24.
Son, J., Erno, A., Shea, D. G., Femia, E. E., Zarit, S. H., Stephens, M.A. (2007). The caregiver stress process and health outcomes, 19 (6), 871-887. Journal of Aging and Health.
 
25.
Tur-Sinai, A., Bentur, N., Fabbietti, P., Lamura, G. (2021). Impact of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic on formal and informal care of community-dwelling older adults: cross-national clustering of empirical evidence from 23 Countries, 13, 1-13. Sustainability.
 
26.
Tur-Sinai, A., Casanova, G., Lamura, G. (2020a). Changes in the provision of family care to frail older people in familistic welfare states: Lessons from Israel and Italy, 32 (9), 972-986. J. Journal of Aging and Health.
 
27.
Tur-Sinai, A., Teti, A., Rommel, A., Hlebec, V., Lamura, G. (2020b). How many older informal caregivers are there in Europe? Estimates from three European surveys in comparison, 17 (24), 1-17. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
 
28.
Zigante, V. (2018). Informal Care in Europe-Exploring Formalisation, Availability and Quality. Publications Office of the European Union.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top