Special negotiations team as a temporary participating entity in the Act on companies established as a result of cross-border transformation, merger or division
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Jagielloński
 
 
Submission date: 2023-09-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-11-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-11-28
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Wojciech Baran   

Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
 
 
JoMS 2023;53(4):43-57
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the legal status of a special negotiations team as a temporary participating entity in the Act on companies established as a result of cross-border transformation, merger or division.

Material and methods:
The article uses the legal dogmatic method.

Results:
Based on the directive of contractual freedom, I am of the opinion that there are no legal barriers that might prevent the parties from including other important issues in the agreement, for example those related to the legal mechanisms of maintaining the negotiations confidential. The special negotiations team may also include in the agreement a consent for limiting the employees’ participation rights in a company created as a result of trans-border transformation, merger or division of companies.

Conclusions:
The special negotiations team as an entity of a participatory nature has a temporary status, because its main task is to enter in the participatory agreement with the competent body of the company. Upon concluding the agreement, the team is dissolved ex lege.

 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Baran, K.W. (2019). (in:) Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Komentarz [Collective Labour Law. A Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.). Warsaw.
 
2.
Baran, K. W., Lekston M, (2019). (in:) Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Komentarz [Collective Labour Law. A Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.). Warsaw.
 
3.
Gładoch, M. (2005). Uczestnictwo pracowników w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwem w Polsce. Proeblemy teorii I praktyki na tle prawa wspólnotowego [Employees’ participation in an enterprise management in Poland. Theoretical and practical problems in the light of the Community law], Toruń.
 
4.
Hajn, Z. (2013). Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Zarys systemu. [Collective Labour Law. A system outline] Warsaw.
 
5.
Książek, D. (2019). (in:) Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Komentarz [Collective Labour Law. A Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.). Warsaw.
 
6.
Lekston, M. (2019). (in:) Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Komentarz [Collective Labour Law. A Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.). Warsaw.
 
7.
Perdeus, W. (2022). (in:) Kodeks pracy. Komentarz [The Labour Code. Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.), Vol. 2. Warsaw.
 
8.
Przybyłowski, K. (1970). Dobra wiara w polskim prawie cywilnym (uwagi ogólne o pojęciu) [Good Faith in Polish Civil Law. General Remarks] Studia cywilistyczne 1970 Vol. 15.
 
9.
Świątkowski, A, Wujczyk, M. (2008). Miękkie (soft) standardy międzynarodowe i „twarde (hard) krajowe o informacji i konsultacji pracowników [Soft international standards and hard national standards on information and consultation with employees], (in:) Informowanie i konsultowanie pracowników w polskim prawie pracy [Informing employees and consulting with employees in Polish labour law], A. Sobczyk (ed.), Kraków.
 
10.
Tomanek, A. (2019). (in:) Zbiorowe prawo pracy. Komentarz [Collective Labour Law. A Commentary], K.W. Baran (ed.). Warsaw.
 
11.
Wratny, J. (2014). (in:) System prawa pracy [The Labour Law System]. Zbiorowe prawo pracy [The Labour Law System. Collective Labour Law], K.W. Baran (ed.), Vol. 5. Warsaw.
 
12.
Włodarczyk, M. (2014). (in:) System prawa pracy [The Labour Law System]. Zbiorowe prawo pracy [The Labour Law System. Collective Labour Law], K.W. Baran (ed.), Vol. 5. Warsaw.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top