About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Ethical Code for authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Ethical Code or Peer Reviewers
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
ORIGINAL PAPER
Sharenting and Child’s Privacy in the Digital World. On the Need to Supplement Regulations Regarding to Legal Protection of Child’s Personal Rights
1
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Faculty of Law and Administration
Submission date: 2024-02-09
Acceptance date: 2024-07-22
Publication date: 2024-09-22
Corresponding author
JoMS 2024;58(4):303-319
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to draw attention to the insufficient protection of a child’s privacy when parents share information, photos or videos with their child on the Internet.
Material and methods:
The work was based on the analysis of literature in the field of sociology and law regarding the phenomenon of sharenting, including its cause and the threats it carries. The work analyzed legal regulation regarding the scope of parental interference in the personal rights of the child.
Results:
The considerations carried out lead to the conclusion that the existing legal regulations do not sufficiently protect the child against violation of personal rights by parents, in particular in the context of parents sharing photos or videos of the child on social networks.
Conclusions:
It was proposed to supplement the regulations of the Family and Guardianship Code with a clear indication that the obligation of the parent or guardian, as part of the exercise of parental authority, is also to protect the privacy and image of the child.
The aim of the article is to draw attention to the insufficient protection of a child’s privacy when parents share information, photos or videos with their child on the Internet.
Material and methods:
The work was based on the analysis of literature in the field of sociology and law regarding the phenomenon of sharenting, including its cause and the threats it carries. The work analyzed legal regulation regarding the scope of parental interference in the personal rights of the child.
Results:
The considerations carried out lead to the conclusion that the existing legal regulations do not sufficiently protect the child against violation of personal rights by parents, in particular in the context of parents sharing photos or videos of the child on social networks.
Conclusions:
It was proposed to supplement the regulations of the Family and Guardianship Code with a clear indication that the obligation of the parent or guardian, as part of the exercise of parental authority, is also to protect the privacy and image of the child.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Bessant, C., & Schnebbe, M. (2022). Does the GDPR offer a solution to the ,,problem” of sharenting?. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 6, 352–356.
2.
Błasiak, A. (2019). Narracje rodziców w przestrzeni mediów społecznościowych – zarys problematyki na przykładzie zjawiska sharentingu. Biografistyka Pedagogiczna, 1, 373–386.
3.
Brosch, A. (2017). Sharenting – nowy wymiar rodzicielstwa? W: H. Krauze-Sikorska, M. Klichowski (red.), Świat małego dziecka. Przestrzeń instytucji, cyberprzestrzeń i inne przestrzenie dzieciństwa, 379–387. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
4.
Cisek, A., Mazurkiewicz, J., Strzebinczyk, J. (1988). O rozszerzenie ochrony dóbr osobistych dziecka i macierzyństwa prenatalnego. Nowe Prawo, 10–11, 70 i nast.
5.
Chrostowska, B. (2018). Sharenting – skala i wielowymiarowość zjawiska (nierozważnego) ujawniania przez rodziców informacji o dzieciach w mediach społecznościowych. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 4, 58–68.
6.
Donovan, S. (2020). ,,Sharenting”: The Forgotten Children of the GDPR. Peace Human Rights Governance. 4(1), 35–59.
7.
Gaweł, H. (2022). Analiza śladów cyfrowych z perspektywy informatologii i cyberbezpieczeństwa. W: S. Cisek, M. Wójcik (red.), Diagnostyka w zarządzaniu informacją; perspektywa nauk o komunikacji społecznej i mediach w kontekście rozwoju badań interdyscyplinarnych, 65–81. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.
8.
Grabalska, W., Wielki, R. (2022). Czy dzieci powinny trafić do sieci?. Prawne i kryminologiczne aspekty zjawiska sharentingu. Prawo w działaniu, 49, 50–66.
9.
Hernacka-Janikowska, A., (2023). (Nie)bezpieczeństwo dziecka w sieci – analiza krytyczna zjawiska sharentingu, troll parentingu i monetyzacji wizerunku dziecka. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 61, 77–92.
10.
Janik-Skowrońska, H. (2023). Odpowiedzialność indywidualna każdego z rodziców za wychowanie dzieci: zarys standardu europejskiego. Journal of Modern Science, 50, 411–426.
11.
Kierzkowska, M. (2022). Sharenting – pomiędzy prawem rodzica do wyrażania siebie w mediach społecznościowych a ochroną prywatności dziecka. Kultura i Wychowanie, 2, 41–55.
12.
Lipu M., Siibak, A. (2020). ,,Take it down!”: Estonian parents’ and pre-teens’ opinions and experiences with sharenting. Media International Australia, 170(1), 57–67.
13.
Maniszewska-Ejsmont, J. (2022). Sharenting a prawa dziecka – rozważania nad władzą rodzicielską w dobie mediów społecznościowych. Palestra, 4, 73–86.
14.
Michałowska, K. (2022). Granice rodzicielskich ingerencji w dobra osobiste dziecka – zagadnienia wybrane. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 3, 49–69.
15.
Ochońska, Z. (2019). Dysponowanie dobrami osobistymi małoletniego. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 3, 103–121.
16.
Sarnecki, P. (2016). Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz t. II. W: L. Garlicki, M. Zubik (red.). Wolters Kluwer.
17.
Siibak A., & Traks K. (2019). The dark sides of sharenting. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11(1), 115–121.
18.
Sitek, B. (2017). Mediacja szansą na ocalenie małżeństwa? Studium prawa rzymskiego, kanonicznego i cywilnego. Journal of Modern Science, 3, 113–131.
20.
Udenze, S., & Bode, O.S. (2020). Sharenting in Digital Age: A Netnographic Investigation. International Journal of Darshan Institute on Engineering Research and Emerging Technologies, 9, 29–34.
21.
Uliasz, J. (2020). Prawna ochrona prywatności oraz wolności dzieci w Internecie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza, 110, 285–298.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
