PL EN
 
PL EN
About the Journal
Archive
For Authors
Publication procedure
Contact
4/2013 vol. 19
Stats
CC BY-SA 4.0
Get citation
Review on Quality of Doctoral Study Program
Yanyan Li 1
,
 
Jana Poláchová Vašťatková 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Education, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic
 
 
Publication date: 2018-06-30
 
 
JoMS 2013;19(4):123-140
 
Article (PDF)
References (59)
 
KEYWORDS
Doctoral education
doctoral study program
quality
Ph.D
review
 
ABSTRACT
The doctoral study program has drawn the attention of researchers from national authorities, academic association and international organizations for the substantial influence on the innovation of human society. As the extension of tertiary education during the earlier decade, the doctoral study program started to face the distinct motivation. It is the core to keep the guarantee of the quality of their study program targeted at the ideal of a doctoral study program of the respective disciplines in higher education institutions. Therefore, in this article, those researches on the theme of “Quality of doctoral study program” is reviewed. Seven fileds have been identified: researches on the problem of recruitment, completion rate and attrition rate; investigations on the amounts, composition and studies path of Ph.D. students; studies on the relationship between supervisors and Ph.D. students, interaction among peers; seeks of the organization and social inclusion of program; discussions of the content of studies and academic examination of thesis; surveys of the employment of graduates; recommendation of the quality evaluation models of doctoral study program.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA)
REFERENCES (59)
1.
AAU(Association of American Universities). (1998). Committe on graduate education: report and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/publication....
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEd-PERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1),p. 31-47. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Ali, A. & Fred Kohun. (2006). “Dealing with isolation feelings at IS doctoral programs”. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, p. 21-33.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Auriol, L. (2007). Labour market characteristics and international mobility of doctorate holders: results for seven countries. OECD STI Working Paper 2007-02. OECD: Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.or/sti/working....
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Barnes, B. J. & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective.Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), p. 297-315. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bell-ellison, B. & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do doctoral students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), p. 555-567. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s111....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., p. 346.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Blume, S. & Amsterdamska, O. (1987). Post-graduate education in the 1980s. Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre, ISBN 20036-4095. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Brooks, R. L., & Heiland, D. (2007). Accountability, assessment and doctoral education: Recommendations for moving forward. European Journal of Education, 42(3), p. 351-362. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Booth, A. L. & Satchell, S. E. (1996). British PhD completion rates: Some evidence from the 1980s. Higher Education Review, 28(2), p. 48. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Bowen, W. G. & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. 1992. p. 468. ISBN 9780691042947.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
CGS(Council of graduate schools). (2007). Ph.D. completion project. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Chen, S. (2012). The establishment of a quality management system for the higher education industry. Quality and Quantity, 46(4), p. 1279-1296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s111....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Clark, B. R., ed. (1993). The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Clark, M. J. (1982). Conditions influencing the career accomplishments of ph.D.s. (No. ETS-82-18; GREB-76-2R). Educational Testing Service,Princeton, NJ 08541. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Costley, C. & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: Professional extension at the highest levels. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), p. 257-269. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc... CRAC (The Career Development Organisation) (2010). What do researchers do? Doctoral graduate destinations and impact three years on 2010.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
CRAC: Cambridge. ISBN 9781906774134. Retrieved from http://www.crac.org.uk/.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
DeBoyes, Z. M. (2010). A sense of trust through the eyes of African American dctoral students: an examination of how a predominantly White institution of higher education can create an environment of inclusiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, p. 3364-3364. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Eggins, H. (2008). Trends and issues in post graduate education: a global review. Keynote paper for the DCU/UNESCO Forum Workshop Dublin, Ireland, 5-7 Mar. 2008. Restrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/educa....
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Groen, J. A., So, E. & Price, J. (2007). Inside the black box of doctoral education: What program characteristics influence doctoral students’ attrition and graduation probabilities? Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 29(2), p. 134-150. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), p. 3-13. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
ENQA(European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education).(2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/pubs_esg.la....
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Espinoza, R. M. (2008). Pivotal moments: overcoming class and racial-ethnic disadvantage in women’s doctoral education. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, p. 3609-3609. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Ferber, M. A. & Kordick, B. (1978). Sex differentials in the earnings of ph.D.s. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31(2), p. 227. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. Review of Higher Education, 32(3), p. 383-406. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Golde, C. M. & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: what the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. A survey initiated by the pew charitable trusts. Retrieved from http://www.phdsurvey.org/repor....
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. & Gerstl-Pepin, C. (2006). Engaging graduate education: A pedagogy for epistemological and theoretical diversity. Review of Higher Education, 29(3), p. 319-0_6. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Hall, L. A., & Burns, L. D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), p. 49-70, p. 166-167. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
HEFCE (Higher Education Founding Council for England). (2005). Ph.D. research degrees: entry and completion. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwed....
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T. & Dally, K. (2004). Investigating Ph.D.thesis examination reports. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), p. 98-120. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Holden, C. (1995). Is it time to begin Ph.D. population control? Science,270(5233), p. 123-128. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
IDAC(Inter-University Doctoral Administrative Committee). (2012). Handbook on graduate supervision: nurturing and managing the supervisor and doctoral student relationship. Retrieved from http://faculty.msvu.ca/educati....
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Ives, G. & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), p. 535-555. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Javadi, M. H. M., Samangooe, B., & Tanhaei, M. H. (2011). Quality assessment for academic services in university of isfahan according to the students opinions using SERVQUAL model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(4), p. 299-305. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Johanson, M. A. (2005). Association of importance of the doctoral degree with students’ perceptions and anticipated activities reflecting professionalism. Physical Therapy, 85(8), p. 766-81. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Kienle, A. W. & Loyd, N. L. (2005). Globalization and the emergence of supranational organizations: Implications for graduate programs in higher education administration. College Student Journal, 39(3), p. 580-587. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Kumar, V. & Lee, A. (2011). Doctoral education in international context: connecting local, regional and global perspectives. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. ISBN 9789673442546.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Leatherman, C. (1998). Research universities urged to do better job of tracking careers of ph.D.’s. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(13), p. 1-A12. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Lee, A. & Danby, S. (2011). Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc... tid=16730.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Lipschutz, S. S. (1993). Enhancing success in doctoral education: From policy to practice. New Directions for Institutional Research, 80, p. 69-80. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Maher, M. A. & Ford, M. E., & Thompson, C. M. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. Review of Higher Education, 27(3), p. 385-408. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Maki, P. L. & Borkowski, N. A. (2006). The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes. Stylus Publishing, LLC. P.O. Box 605, Herndon, VA 20172-0605. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Maxwell, T. W. & Shanahan, P. J. (1996). The doctor of education in Australia: some comparative data. Journal of institutional research in Australasia, 5(1), p. 7-18.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Metcalfe J. & Gray, A. (2005). Employability and doctoral research postgraduates. The higher education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Mullins, G. & Kiley, M. (2002). “It’s a Ph.D., not a Nobel Prize”: how experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education. 27(4), p. 369-386.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Nelson, C. & Lovitts, B. E. (2001). 10 ways to keep graduate students from quitting. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(42), p. 020-B20. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Nerad, M. & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New Directionas for Institutional Research, 92, p. 61-76. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
NSF(National Science Foundation). (2012). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2011. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/....
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Noonan, M. J. & Ballinger, R. & Black, R. (2007). Peer and faculty mentoring in docotral education: definitions, experiences and expectations. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), p. 251-262.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Nyquist, J. D. & Woodford, B. J. (2000). What concerns do we have? Reenvisioning the Ph.D. funded by the pew charitable trusts. Retrived from http://depts.washington.edu/en....
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., Pierson, C. T. & Flowers, L. A. (2004). The role of race in the development of plans for a graduate degree. Review of Higher Education, 27(3), p. 299-320. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Picciano, J., Rudd, E., Morrison, E. & Nerad, M. (2007). Social science Ph.D.s-Five+ Years Out: survey methods. CIRGE Report 2007-01. CIRGE: Seattle, WA. Retrieved from www.cirge.washington.edu.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Quarterman, J. (2008). An assessment of barriers and strategies for recruitment and retention of a diverse graduate student population. College Student Journal, 42(4), p. 947-967. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Ramirez, E. G. (2007). Navigating through highly unequal terrain: Chicanos/as and Latinos/as in graduate education. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Rudd, E. (1968). Students ‘in solitary’. New Society, 11(290), p. 562-563. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Smith, P., Curtis, H., Fulton, J., Kuit, J. & Sanders, G. (2012). The role of practice-base doctorates for developing professional practice. Retrived from www.heacademy.ac.uk.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Smith, R. L., Maroney, K., Nelson, K. W., Abel, A. L. & Abel, H. S. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 45(1), p. 17. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Thurgood, L. & Golladay, M. J. & Hill, S. T. (2006). U.S. doctorates in the 20th century. ArlingtonVA: National Science Foundation. p. 131. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/....
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Woodward, D., Denicolo, P., Hayward, S. & Long, E. (2004). A review of graduate schools in the UK. UK Council for Graduate Education. p.49. ISBN 0-9543915-1-9.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
The use of traditional and agile Project Management methodologies in ICT
The role of administrative premises, recognition of selected criteria in the partial functioning of self-government units
Training in mediation as a guarantee of quality of the mediating institution.
The low turnout of students as one of the causes of school failure
Participation in Slovenian Urban Municipalities – Theory and Practice
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top