O czasopiśmie
O czasopiśmie
Kolegium Redakcyjne
Rada Naukowa
Recenzenci
Kodeks Etyczny
Wydania Specjalne
Terminy czasopisma
RODO - informacje o przetwarzaniu danych osobowych
Indeksacja
Licencje i dostęp
Archiwum
Dla autorów
Zasady publikacji
Techniczna instrukcja dla autorów
Umowa o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji CC BY-SA
Oświadczenie autora o prawach autorskich
Procedura publikacji
Kontakt
O czasopiśmie
O czasopiśmie
Kolegium Redakcyjne
Rada Naukowa
Recenzenci
Kodeks Etyczny
Wydania Specjalne
Terminy czasopisma
RODO - informacje o przetwarzaniu danych osobowych
Indeksacja
Licencje i dostęp
Review on Quality of Doctoral Study Program
1
Faculty of Education,
Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic
Data publikacji: 30-06-2018
JoMS 2013;19(4):123-140
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
The doctoral study program has drawn the attention of researchers
from national authorities, academic association and international organizations
for the substantial influence on the innovation of human society.
As the extension of tertiary education during the earlier decade, the doctoral
study program started to face the distinct motivation. It is the core
to keep the guarantee of the quality of their study program targeted at the
ideal of a doctoral study program of the respective disciplines in higher
education institutions. Therefore, in this article, those researches on the
theme of “Quality of doctoral study program” is reviewed. Seven fileds
have been identified: researches on the problem of recruitment, completion
rate and attrition rate; investigations on the amounts, composition
and studies path of Ph.D. students; studies on the relationship between
supervisors and Ph.D. students, interaction among peers; seeks of the organization
and social inclusion of program; discussions of the content of
studies and academic examination of thesis; surveys of the employment of
graduates; recommendation of the quality evaluation models of doctoral
study program.
Licencja
REFERENCJE (59)
1.
AAU(Association of American Universities). (1998). Committe on graduate education: report and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/publication....
2.
Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEd-PERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1),p. 31-47. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
3.
Ali, A. & Fred Kohun. (2006). “Dealing with isolation feelings at IS doctoral programs”. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, p. 21-33.
4.
Auriol, L. (2007). Labour market characteristics and international mobility of doctorate holders: results for seven countries. OECD STI Working Paper 2007-02. OECD: Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.or/sti/working....
5.
Barnes, B. J. & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective.Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), p. 297-315. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
6.
Bell-ellison, B. & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do doctoral students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), p. 555-567. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s111....
7.
Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., p. 346.
8.
Blume, S. & Amsterdamska, O. (1987). Post-graduate education in the 1980s. Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Centre, ISBN 20036-4095. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
9.
Brooks, R. L., & Heiland, D. (2007). Accountability, assessment and doctoral education: Recommendations for moving forward. European Journal of Education, 42(3), p. 351-362. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
10.
Booth, A. L. & Satchell, S. E. (1996). British PhD completion rates: Some evidence from the 1980s. Higher Education Review, 28(2), p. 48. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
11.
Bowen, W. G. & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. 1992. p. 468. ISBN 9780691042947.
12.
CGS(Council of graduate schools). (2007). Ph.D. completion project. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/.
13.
Chen, S. (2012). The establishment of a quality management system for the higher education industry. Quality and Quantity, 46(4), p. 1279-1296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s111....
14.
Clark, B. R., ed. (1993). The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
15.
Clark, M. J. (1982). Conditions influencing the career accomplishments of ph.D.s. (No. ETS-82-18; GREB-76-2R). Educational Testing Service,Princeton, NJ 08541. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
16.
Costley, C. & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: Professional extension at the highest levels. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), p. 257-269. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc... CRAC (The Career Development Organisation) (2010). What do researchers do? Doctoral graduate destinations and impact three years on 2010.
18.
DeBoyes, Z. M. (2010). A sense of trust through the eyes of African American dctoral students: an examination of how a predominantly White institution of higher education can create an environment of inclusiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, p. 3364-3364. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
19.
Eggins, H. (2008). Trends and issues in post graduate education: a global review. Keynote paper for the DCU/UNESCO Forum Workshop Dublin, Ireland, 5-7 Mar. 2008. Restrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/educa....
20.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Groen, J. A., So, E. & Price, J. (2007). Inside the black box of doctoral education: What program characteristics influence doctoral students’ attrition and graduation probabilities? Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 29(2), p. 134-150. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
21.
Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), p. 3-13. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
22.
ENQA(European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education).(2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/pubs_esg.la....
23.
Espinoza, R. M. (2008). Pivotal moments: overcoming class and racial-ethnic disadvantage in women’s doctoral education. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, p. 3609-3609. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
24.
Ferber, M. A. & Kordick, B. (1978). Sex differentials in the earnings of ph.D.s. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31(2), p. 227. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
25.
Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. Review of Higher Education, 32(3), p. 383-406. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
26.
Golde, C. M. & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: what the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. A survey initiated by the pew charitable trusts. Retrieved from http://www.phdsurvey.org/repor....
27.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. & Gerstl-Pepin, C. (2006). Engaging graduate education: A pedagogy for epistemological and theoretical diversity. Review of Higher Education, 29(3), p. 319-0_6. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
28.
Hall, L. A., & Burns, L. D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), p. 49-70, p. 166-167. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
29.
HEFCE (Higher Education Founding Council for England). (2005). Ph.D. research degrees: entry and completion. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwed....
30.
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T. & Dally, K. (2004). Investigating Ph.D.thesis examination reports. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), p. 98-120. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
31.
Holden, C. (1995). Is it time to begin Ph.D. population control? Science,270(5233), p. 123-128. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
32.
IDAC(Inter-University Doctoral Administrative Committee). (2012). Handbook on graduate supervision: nurturing and managing the supervisor and doctoral student relationship. Retrieved from http://faculty.msvu.ca/educati....
33.
Ives, G. & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), p. 535-555. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
34.
Javadi, M. H. M., Samangooe, B., & Tanhaei, M. H. (2011). Quality assessment for academic services in university of isfahan according to the students opinions using SERVQUAL model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(4), p. 299-305. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
35.
Johanson, M. A. (2005). Association of importance of the doctoral degree with students’ perceptions and anticipated activities reflecting professionalism. Physical Therapy, 85(8), p. 766-81. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
36.
Kienle, A. W. & Loyd, N. L. (2005). Globalization and the emergence of supranational organizations: Implications for graduate programs in higher education administration. College Student Journal, 39(3), p. 580-587. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
37.
Kumar, V. & Lee, A. (2011). Doctoral education in international context: connecting local, regional and global perspectives. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. ISBN 9789673442546.
38.
Leatherman, C. (1998). Research universities urged to do better job of tracking careers of ph.D.’s. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(13), p. 1-A12. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
39.
Lee, A. & Danby, S. (2011). Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc... tid=16730.
40.
Lipschutz, S. S. (1993). Enhancing success in doctoral education: From policy to practice. New Directions for Institutional Research, 80, p. 69-80. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
41.
Maher, M. A. & Ford, M. E., & Thompson, C. M. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. Review of Higher Education, 27(3), p. 385-408. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
42.
Maki, P. L. & Borkowski, N. A. (2006). The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes. Stylus Publishing, LLC. P.O. Box 605, Herndon, VA 20172-0605. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
43.
Maxwell, T. W. & Shanahan, P. J. (1996). The doctor of education in Australia: some comparative data. Journal of institutional research in Australasia, 5(1), p. 7-18.
44.
Metcalfe J. & Gray, A. (2005). Employability and doctoral research postgraduates. The higher education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk.
45.
Mullins, G. & Kiley, M. (2002). “It’s a Ph.D., not a Nobel Prize”: how experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education. 27(4), p. 369-386.
46.
Nelson, C. & Lovitts, B. E. (2001). 10 ways to keep graduate students from quitting. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(42), p. 020-B20. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
47.
Nerad, M. & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New Directionas for Institutional Research, 92, p. 61-76. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
48.
NSF(National Science Foundation). (2012). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2011. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/....
49.
Noonan, M. J. & Ballinger, R. & Black, R. (2007). Peer and faculty mentoring in docotral education: definitions, experiences and expectations. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), p. 251-262.
50.
Nyquist, J. D. & Woodford, B. J. (2000). What concerns do we have? Reenvisioning the Ph.D. funded by the pew charitable trusts. Retrived from http://depts.washington.edu/en....
51.
Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., Pierson, C. T. & Flowers, L. A. (2004). The role of race in the development of plans for a graduate degree. Review of Higher Education, 27(3), p. 299-320. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
52.
Picciano, J., Rudd, E., Morrison, E. & Nerad, M. (2007). Social science Ph.D.s-Five+ Years Out: survey methods. CIRGE Report 2007-01. CIRGE: Seattle, WA. Retrieved from www.cirge.washington.edu.
53.
Quarterman, J. (2008). An assessment of barriers and strategies for recruitment and retention of a diverse graduate student population. College Student Journal, 42(4), p. 947-967. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
54.
Ramirez, E. G. (2007). Navigating through highly unequal terrain: Chicanos/as and Latinos/as in graduate education. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
55.
Rudd, E. (1968). Students ‘in solitary’. New Society, 11(290), p. 562-563. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
56.
Smith, P., Curtis, H., Fulton, J., Kuit, J. & Sanders, G. (2012). The role of practice-base doctorates for developing professional practice. Retrived from www.heacademy.ac.uk.
57.
Smith, R. L., Maroney, K., Nelson, K. W., Abel, A. L. & Abel, H. S. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 45(1), p. 17. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/doc....
58.
Thurgood, L. & Golladay, M. J. & Hill, S. T. (2006). U.S. doctorates in the 20th century. ArlingtonVA: National Science Foundation. p. 131. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/....
59.
Woodward, D., Denicolo, P., Hayward, S. & Long, E. (2004). A review of graduate schools in the UK. UK Council for Graduate Education. p.49. ISBN 0-9543915-1-9.
Udostępnij
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
Przetwarzamy dane osobowe zbierane podczas odwiedzania serwisu. Realizacja funkcji pozyskiwania informacji o użytkownikach i ich zachowaniu odbywa się poprzez dobrowolnie wprowadzone w formularzach informacje oraz zapisywanie w urządzeniach końcowych plików cookies (tzw. ciasteczka). Dane, w tym pliki cookies, wykorzystywane są w celu realizacji usług, zapewnienia wygodnego korzystania ze strony oraz w celu monitorowania ruchu zgodnie z Polityką prywatności. Dane są także zbierane i przetwarzane przez narzędzie Google Analytics (więcej).
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
