PRACA ORYGINALNA
Postmaterialism in Innovation and Religious Faith
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział Zarządzania Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Architektury
 
 
Data nadesłania: 16-01-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 07-12-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 29-12-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Elżbieta Wojnicka-Sycz   

Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział Zarządzania Politechnika Gdańska, Wydział Architektury
 
 
JoMS 2024;60(6):401-428
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The postmaterialist paradigm in science is reflected in innovation research. It implies a shift of attention towards the intangible needs of people and the goals of sustainable development, rather than profit and economic growth as the goals of innovation. It reflects Catholic social teaching with its emphasis on social and environmental issues. In the article I explore if the Christian religion is conducive to post-materialist attitudes, and if post-materialism is more prevalent among people more involved in innovative activities in the workplace and in more innovative countries.

Material and methods:
Worlds Value Survey and OECD data were analyzed to explore the relationship between postmaterialism, religious belief, and innovation. The methods used were contingency tables and tests of significance for differences in proportions, and logit models

Results:
The results show that Christian religion is associated with postmaterialist attitudes and work connected with innovation processes. However, postmaterialism also appears to replace religion for atheists, which reflects the human need for spirituality and ethics.

Conclusions:
The results show that there is a social background in more developed countries to the transformation toward a postmaterialist innovation ecosystem, including not only business innovation, but also non-profit innovation. Postmaterialist innovation aims not only for individual material well-being, but also for a higher quality of life for entire societies. It is also in line with Catholic social teaching.

Licencja
FINANSOWANIE
Uniwersytet Gdański - sfinansowanie opłaty publikacyjnej i programu Stata do obliczeń
REFERENCJE (30)
1.
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, 3, 2003, p. 35-41.
 
2.
Danezis, E., Theodosiou, E., Gonidakis, I., Dimitrijevic, M.S. (2005). ‘Un-tangible World’ and Modern Physics, European Journal of Science and Theology, December, Vol.1, No.4, 11-17.
 
3.
Edler, J. (ed.)., Cunningham, P.(ed.)., Gok, A. (ed.)., Shapira P.(ed.). (2016). Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, Eu-SPRI Forum on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy series, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham,.
 
4.
Freire-Gibb, L.C., Gregson, G. (2019). Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America, Local Economy, 34(8): 787-806, doi:10.1177/0269094219896096.
 
5.
Furusawa, K. (2008). Values and Democracy: Postmaterialist Shift versus Cultural Particularity in Russia, the USA, Britain and Japan. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.
 
6.
Gambardella, A., Raasch, Ch., von Hippel, E. (2016). The User Innovation Paradigm: Impacts on Markets and Welfare, Management Science, Vol. 63, No. 5.
 
7.
Giacalone, R.A., Jurkiewicz, C.L., Knouse, S.B. (2012). The Ethical Aftermath of a Values Revolution: Theoretical Bases of Change, Recalibration, and Principalization, Journal of Business Ethics, October, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 333-343.
 
8.
Hagen, A., Higdem, U. (2019). Calculate, Communicate, and Innovate: Do We Need Innovate as a Third Position?, Journal of Planning Literature, 34(4).:421-433, 2019.
 
9.
Henn, M., Sloam J., Nunes, A. (2022). Young cosmopolitans and environmental politics: how postmaterialist values inform and shape youth engagement in environmental politics, Journal of Youth Studies, 25:6, 709-729, 2022, DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2021.1994131.
 
10.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 
11.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift. In Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 
12.
Jeroense, T., Luimers, J., Jacobs K., Spierings, N. (2022). Political social media use and its linkage to populist and postmaterialist attitudes and vote intention in the Netherlands, European Political Science, 193–215, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304....
 
13.
Kowalik, D., Nowak, K., Kowalik, K., Gogacz, P. (2023). The Role of the Catholic Church against Changes and Threats to the Value of Work. Religions 14: 1207, https://doi.org/10.3390/ rel14091207.
 
14.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
 
15.
Lopes, A.P., de Carvalho, M.M. (2018). Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.132, 2018.
 
16.
McCarthy, D., Stoneman, P., Ka Ki Ho, L. (2023). Explaining confidence in the police within transitional Hong Kong: the influence of postmaterial values, Policing and Society, 33:1, 96-110, DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2022.2055019.
 
17.
Müller, H. (2004). The application of Inglehart’s materialism/postmaterialism index in non-industrialised countries: a critique, Acta Academica 36 (1): 127-156.
 
18.
Nelson, R.R. (ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, Oxford University Press.
 
19.
OSLO Manual, OECD & Eurostat, Paris. (2005 & 2018).
 
20.
Pansera, M., Fressoli, M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era, Organization, 28(3).:380-404.
 
21.
Schot, J., Steinmuelle, W.E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Research Policy, Vol. 47:9.
 
22.
Shabanova, Y. (2019). Conceptual Foundations of the Postmaterialist Paradigm of Science, Philosophy and Cosmology, Vol.22.
 
23.
Silva-Flores, M.L. (2019). Social Innovation Policies: A Way Through Consolidating Emerging Innovation Infrastructures, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 24(3).
 
24.
Sitek, B. (2013). The human right to respect the religious identity in the light of the media and political regulation. In: M. Sitek i inni (red.), Europe of Founding Fathers: Investment in common future (pp. 257–264). Olsztyn: Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
 
25.
Skyttner, L. (2001). General Systems Theory, Ideas and Applications, World Scientific.
 
26.
Stål, H.I., Babri, M. (2020). Educational interventions for sustainable innovation in small and medium sized enterprises, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.243:1.
 
27.
Szymczak, W. (2010)., Podstawy statystyki dla psychologów [Fundamentals of statistics for psychologists], Difin, Warszawa.
 
28.
Tatarczyk D. (2023). Catholicism, Pluralism and American Democracy Politics and Religion, 16, 393–398, doi:10.1017/S1755048323000019.
 
29.
Tormos, R. (2012)., Postmaterialist values and adult political learning. Changing Intracohort Values in Western Europe, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS)., 140 (1), 201-228.
 
30.
Wojnicka-Sycz, E., Sycz, P. (2023). Innovative ecosystem based on a sixtuple helix on the example of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship, Journal of Modern Science, 52(3), 172-189, https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/1....
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top