Participatory Budget as a Tool for Local
Community Development in Ukraine
More details
Hide details
1
Dean of the Law Faculty,
Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine
2
Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative
and Information Law, Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine
Publication date: 2017-03-31
JoMS 2017;32(1):285-303
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The sustainable development of the local self-government institute in modern
democracies, the introduction of the principles of subsidiarity, regionalization and
decentralization show a clear need for implementing the systemic reforms aimed at
strengthening local initiatives in Ukraine. Therefore, there is a need to increase the
role of self-governing structures, to grapple for the ways of adaptating governance
at the regional level to the long-standing European traditions of democratic
governance, and to address the procedural issues of the power distribution, transfer
and delegation, in particular the formation and distribution of local budgets. One
of the most effective tools to enhance local communities is a participatory budget,
the implementation of which in Ukraine is gaining momentum and needs to be
analyzed, and to be supported upon its successful realization. This article focuses on
the analysis of the implementation of participatory budget as an instrument of the
local community development in Ukraine in the case of the city of Sumy.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Abers, R. (1998). From Clientelismto Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy and Civic Organizingin Porto Alegre, Brazil, „Politics and Society” No. 26(4), p. 511–537.
2.
Aitken, B.J., Harrison, A.E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela, „The American Economic Review”, vol. 89, Issue 3, p. 605–618.
3.
Avritzter, L. (2006). New public spheres in Brazil: Local democracy and deliberative politics, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, vol. 30.3.
4.
Baiocchi, G. (2001). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experimentand Deliberative Democratic Theory, „Politics and Society”, No. 29(1), p. 43–72.
5.
Bassoli, M. (2012). Participatory budgeting in Italy: an Analysis of (Almost Democratic) Participatory Governance Arrangements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Development .
6.
Bassoli, M. (2010). Participatory Budgeting in Italy: An Analysis of (Almost Democratic) Participatory Governance Arrangements. In International Journal of Urban and Regional Research . DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01023.x.
7.
Hartz-Karp, J. (2012). Laying the Groundwork for Participatory Budgeting – Developing a Deliberative Community and Collaborative Governance: Greater Geraldton, Western Australia, „Journal of Public Deliberation”, vol. 8, Issue 2.
8.
Participatory Budgeting/Ed. A. Shah. ‒ Washington: The World Bank (2007), p. 269.
9.
Polko, A. (2015). Models of participatory budgeting – the case study of Polish city, „Journal of Economics and Management”, vol. 19(1), p. 34–44.
10.
Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Rocke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potential and challenges, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, March, vol. 32.1.
11.
Белец , Ж.А. (2016). Партиципаторне бюджетування як інноваційний демократичний інструмент участі громадян в управлінні справами територіальних громад. Теорія та практика державного управління і місцевого самоврядування. № 1, p. 20–35.
12.
Енциклопедичний словник з державного управління. (2010). уклад.: Ю.П. Сурмін, В.Д. Бакуменко, А.М. Михненко та ін.. ; за ред. Ю.В. Ковбасюка, В.П. Трощинського, Ю.П. Сурміна. Київ. НАДУ. – 820 с.