About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Parental self-efficacy in connecting children with nature in Poland and Iceland. A study using the NCPSE scale
1
Institute of Pedagogy
Faculty of Education and Psychology
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Głęboka 43, PL
2
Centre of Language and Literacy
Department of Education and Youth in Reykjavik, Stakkahlíð, 105 Reykjavík, IS
Submission date: 2023-05-15
Final revision date: 2023-12-09
Acceptance date: 2023-12-11
Publication date: 2023-12-30
Corresponding author
Teresa Bożena Parczewska
Institute of Pedagogy Faculty of Education and Psychology Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Głęboka 43, PL
Institute of Pedagogy Faculty of Education and Psychology Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Głęboka 43, PL
JoMS 2023;53(4):510-539
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The article presents the results of a Polish-Icelandic project aimed to examine parents’ beliefs about their self-efficacy in connecting their children with nature.
Material and methods:
The international research tool Nature Connectedness Parental Self-Efficacy (NCPSE) scale was used. The measure consists of 22 items grouped into four subscales: I Accessing nature; II Communicating about nature; III Overcoming personal barriers; IV. Overcoming situational barriers. From May to November 2022, a survey was conducted among 244 respondents (129 from Poland and 115 from Iceland ) bringing up preschool children and children in early childhood education.
Results:
The obtained results show that the compared groups differ statistically significantly, mainly in subscales II and III. Apart from the differences, many commonalities were also noted.
Conclusions:
An analysis of parents’ self-efficacy is important for parents themselves, researchers, decision-makers, and organizations responsible for strengthening the youngest citizens’ involvement in taking action in and for nature.
The article presents the results of a Polish-Icelandic project aimed to examine parents’ beliefs about their self-efficacy in connecting their children with nature.
Material and methods:
The international research tool Nature Connectedness Parental Self-Efficacy (NCPSE) scale was used. The measure consists of 22 items grouped into four subscales: I Accessing nature; II Communicating about nature; III Overcoming personal barriers; IV. Overcoming situational barriers. From May to November 2022, a survey was conducted among 244 respondents (129 from Poland and 115 from Iceland ) bringing up preschool children and children in early childhood education.
Results:
The obtained results show that the compared groups differ statistically significantly, mainly in subscales II and III. Apart from the differences, many commonalities were also noted.
Conclusions:
An analysis of parents’ self-efficacy is important for parents themselves, researchers, decision-makers, and organizations responsible for strengthening the youngest citizens’ involvement in taking action in and for nature.
REFERENCES (77)
1.
Ahmetoglu, E. (2019). The contributions of familial and environmental factors on children’s connection with nature and outdoor activities. Early Childhood Development and Care, 189(2): 233– 243.
2.
Arnold, H. E., F. G. Cohen, Warner, A. (2009). Youth and environmental action: perspectives of young Environmental leaders on their formative influences. The Journal of Environmental Education 40(3): 27–36.
3.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review 84(2): 191-215.
4.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
6.
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent Development from an Agentic Perspective. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, (pp.1-43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7.
Barnes, Ch., Harvey, C., Holland, F., Wall, S. (2021). Development and testing of the Nature Connectedness Parental Self-Efficacy (NCPSE) scale. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 65(3). https://www.sciencedirect.com/....
8.
Barrable, A., Booth, D. (2020). Increasing Nature Connection in Children: A Mini Review of Interventions. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 492.
9.
Barrows, A. (1995). The Ecopsychology of Child Development. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes & A. D. Kanner (Eds). Ecopsychology: restoring the Earth, healing the mind. New York: Sierra Press.
11.
Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to Love the Natural World Enough to Protect It. Barn 2: 57–78.
12.
Chawla, L., Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In S. Clayton (Eds.), Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527– 555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues Early Childhood 5 (1): 68-80.
14.
Coleman, P. K. & Karraker, K. H. (1998). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications. Developmental Review 18(1): 47–85.
15.
Conrad, B., Gross, D., Fogg, L., Ruchala, P. (1992). Maternal confidence, knowledge, and quality of mother-toddler interactions: a preliminary study. Infant Mental Health Journal 13: 353-362.
16.
Cooklin, A. R., Giallo, R., Rose, N. (2012). Parental fatigue and parenting practices during early childhood: an Australian community survey. Child Care Health Development 38 (5): 654-664.
17.
D’Amore, C. & Chawla, L. (2020). Significant life experiences that connect children with nature: A research review and applications to a family nature club. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature (pp. 799– 825). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland.
18.
Dolińska-Zygmunt, G. (2000). Podmiotowe uwarunkowania zachowań promujących zdrowie. [Subjective determinants of health-promoting behaviors.] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Psychologii PAN.
19.
Dopko, R. L., Capaldi, C.A., Zelenski, J.M. (2019). The psychological and social benefits of a nature experience for children: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 63: 134-138.
20.
Duckworth, A. L. and Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher 44: 237–251.
21.
Dumka, L. E., Stoerzinger, H. D. Jackson, K. M. & Roosa, M. W. (1996). Examination of the cross-cultural and cross-language equivalence of the parenting self-agency measure. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies 45(2): 216–222.
22.
Dunning, M., Giallo, J. R. 2012. Fatigue, parenting stress, self-efficacy and satisfaction in mothers of infants and young children. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 30 (2): 145-159.
23.
Erdwins, C. J., L. C. Buffardi, W.J. Casper, A. S. O’Brien. (2001). The relationship of women’s role strain to social support, role satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Family Relations 50 (2001): 230-238.
24.
Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child developmentand maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics 119(1):182-91.
25.
Gordo, L., A. Oliver-Roig, A. Martínez-Pampliega, L. Iriarte Elejalde, M. Fernández-Alcantara, M. Richart-Martínez. (2018). Parental perception of child vulnerability and parental competence: the role of postnatal depression and parental stress in fathers and mothers. PLoS One, 13 (8); https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go....
26.
Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Child and adolescent social gaming: What are the issues of concern? Education for Health, 32, 19–22.
27.
Hartig, T., R. Mitchell, S. De Vries, H. Frumkin. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Reviews of Public Health 35: 207-228.
28.
Hofferth, S. L. & S. C. Curtin. (2006). Changes in Children’s Time, 1997-2002/3: An update. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
29.
Imai, H., T. Nakashizuka, R. Kohsaka. (2018). An analysis of 15 years of trends in children’s connectedness with nature and its relationship with residential environment Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 4 (8): 177-187.
30.
Jones, T. L. & R. J. Prinz.(2005). Potential Roles of Parental Self-Efficacy in Parent and Child Adjustment: A Review. Clinical Psychology Review 25 (3): 341-363.
31.
Jover, M., J. Colomer, J. M. Carot, C. Larsson, M. T. Bobes, J. L. Ivorra, R. Martin-Brufau, J. Sanjuan. (2014). Maternal anxiety following delivery, early infant temperament and mother’s confidence in caregiving. Spanish Journal of Psychology 17: E95.
32.
Juczyński, Z. (2000). Poczucie własnej skuteczności – teoria i pomiar. [Self-efficacy – theory and measurement.] Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Psychologica 4: 11-24.
33.
Keniger, L. E., K. J. Gaston, K. N. Irvine, & R. A. Fuller. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10(3): 913-935.
35.
Kuo, M., M. Barnes, & C. Jordan. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
36.
Larson, L. R., G. T. Green & S. B. Castleberry. (2011). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior 43(1): 72– 89.
37.
Lerner, R. M., F. Rothbaum, S. Boulos, D. R. Castellino. (2002). Developmental systems perspective on parenting. Handbook of Parenting 2: 315-344.
38.
Lewis, A. L. (1996). Green Nature/Human Nature. Urbana and Chicago. IL: University of Illinois Press.
39.
Lippitz, W. (2005). Różnica i obcość. Studia fenomenologiczne w obrębie nauki o wychowaniu. [Difference and strangeness. Phenomenological studies within education studies.] Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
40.
Louv, R. (2008). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
41.
Maddux, J. E., J. Lewis (1995). Self-efficacy and adjustment. Basic principles and issues. J. E. Maddux (Eds.), Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press: 37–68.
42.
McCormick, R. (2017). Does access to green space impact the mental well-being of children: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 37: 3– 7.
43.
Mendoza, J. A., F. J. Zimmerman & D. A. Christakis. (2007). Television viewing, computer use, obesity, and adiposity in US preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 4: 44.
44.
Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 430-434.
45.
Murry, V. M., G. H Brody. (1999). Self-regulation and self-worth of Black children reared in economically stressed, rural, single mother-headed families: the contribution of risk and protective factors. Journal of Family 20 (4): 458-484.
46.
Norwood, M. F., A. Lakhani, S. Fullagar, A. Maujean, M. Downes, J. Byrne, … E. Kendall. (2019). A narrative and systematic review of the behavioural, cognitive and emotional benefits of passive nature exposure on young people: Evidence for prescribing change. Landscape and Urban Planning 189: 71– 79.
47.
Nussbaum, M., C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Developement Approach. London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
48.
Passmore, H. A., L. Martin, M. Richardson, M. White, A. Hunt, S. Pahl. (2020). Parental/guardians’ connectedness to nature better predicts children’s nature connectedness than visits or area-level characteristics. Ecopsychology 13 (2): 103-113.
49.
Porter, C. L. and H. Hsu. (2003). First-time mothers’ perceptions of efficacy during the transition to motherhood: Links to infant temperament. Journal of Family Psychology 17: 54–64.
50.
Pritchard, A., M. Richardson, D. Sheffield, K. McEwan. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: a meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies 21 (3): 1145-1167.
51.
Pyle, R. M. (1993). The thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
52.
Richardson, M., H. A Passmore, L. Barbett, R. Lumber, R. Thomas, A. Hunt. (2020). The green care code: how nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro‐nature conservation behaviours. People Nature, 2 (3): 821-839.
53.
Richardson, M., H. A. Passmore, R. Lumber, R. Thomas & A. Hunt. (2021). Moments, not minutes: the nature-wellbeing relationship. International Journal of Wellbeing, 11(1): 8-33.
54.
Richardson, M., K. McEwan. (2018). 30 Days Wild and the relationships between engagement with nature’s beauty, nature connectedness and well-being. Frontiers Psychology, 9: 1500. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....
55.
Rosa, C. D., S. Collado. (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: setting the ground for future research. Frontiers Psychology, 10: Article 763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
56.
Russell, R., A. D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, R. K. Gould, X. Basurto, K. M. A. Chan, S. Klain, J. Levine and J. Tam. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38(1): 473-502.
57.
Samuelsson, I. & Y. Kaga (Eds.).(2008). The Contribution of Early Childhood Education to Sustainable Society. Paris: UNESCO.
58.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 101–123). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-....
59.
Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond Ecophobia: Reclaiming the Heart of Nature Education. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
60.
Sobel, D. (2008). Childhood and nature: Design principles for educators. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
61.
Soga, M., T. Yamanoi, K. Tsuchiya, T. F. Koyanagi, T. Kanai. (2018). What are the drivers of and barriers to children’s direct experiences of nature? Landscape and Urban Planning., 180: 114-120.
62.
Soga, M., K. J. Gaston. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 2: 94-101.
63.
Soga, M., K. J. Gaston. (2020). The ecology of human–nature interactions. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2....
64.
Stoiber, K. C. & T. G Houghton. (1993). The relationship of adolescent mothers’ expectations, knowledge, and beliefs to their young children’s coping behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 14(1): 61–79.
65.
Stupnicki, A. (2003). Analiza i prezentacja danych ankietowych. [Analysis and presentation of survey data.] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego.
66.
Tilbury, D. (1996). Environmental education and develop-ment education: teaching geography for a sustainableworld. In: Tilbury, D. and Williams, M. (Eds), Teaching and Learning Geography, London: Routledge.
67.
Tillman, S., D. Tobin, W. Avison & J. Gilliland. (2018). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 72: 958– 966.
68.
Vanaken, G. J. & M. Danckaerts. (2018). Impact of green space exposure on children’s and adolescents’ mental health: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(12): 2668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
69.
Vance, A. J., D. H. Brandon. (2017). Delineating Among Parenting Confidence, Parenting Self-Efficacy, and Competence. ANS 40 (4): E18-E37.
70.
Wells, N., G. Evans. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior 35: 311-330.
71.
White, R. (2004). Young children’s relationship with nature: Its importance to children’s development and the earth’s future. White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group.
72.
White, R., V. L. Stoecklin, (2008). Nurturing children’s biophilia: developing appropriate environmental education for young children. White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group. www.live-learn.org/resources/teachers/A_Sense_of_Place_Conference/Biophilia.pdf. (Viewed 5 January 2011).
73.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
74.
Wilson, E. O. (1996). The Environmental Ethic. Hastings Environmental Law Journal 3, 2: 327-33.
75.
Wilson, R. A. (1993). Fostering a sense of wonder during the early childhood years. Columbus, OH: Greyden.
76.
Wilson, R. A. (1997). The Wonders of Nature – Honoring Children’s Ways of Knowing. Early Childhood News 6(19).
77.
Wittkowski, A., C. Garrett, R. Calam, D. Weisberg. (2017). Self-report measures of parental self-efficacy: a systematic review of the current literaturę. Journal of Child and Family Studies 26 (11): 2960-2978.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
