PL EN
ORIGINAL PAPER
Possibilities of Using Artificial Intelligence in Security Analysis
 
More details
Hide details
1
WSGE
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-13
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-12-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-12-23
 
 
Publication date: 2024-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
 
 
JoMS 2024;60(6):694-708
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to present the characteristics and analytical potential of artificial intelligence in the area of ​​security analysis. The text is to help answer the following research questions: • What are the characteristics of analytical imagination identified as a tool that could be used by artificial intelligence in security analyses? • In what circumstances is artificial intelligence able to take into account the characteristics of the intelligence cycle in the generated answers and studies? • Which features of contextual thinking and critical thinking pose a challenge to artificial intelligence, and which are the field of its cognitive advantage over humans?

Material and methods:
Critical analysis, literature analysis

Results:
Analytical imagination consists of two mutually conditioning and partially overlapping elements: contextual thinking and critical thinking. Both of these concepts have their specific properties due to the specificity of the security domain. In this context, it is crucial to understand security as a social process, i.e. a dynamic, variable, fluid phenomenon that requires specific tools from the analyst. This poses a real challenge for artificial intelligence.

Conclusions:
The text discusses a total of twelve features of analytical imagination used in the security domain – five related to contextual thinking and seven related to critical thinking. In total, out of twelve features/variables that make up analytical imagination, artificial intelligence already functions efficiently (or will function efficiently soon) in practically all of them.

REFERENCES (10)
1.
Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz, K. (2019). Cyberbezpieczeństwo – zagadnienia definicyjne, Cybersecurity and Law 2019; 2(2).
 
2.
Chrost, M. (2021). Refleksyjna samoświadomość i działanie osoby, Paedagogia Christiana 1/47.
 
3.
Ciesielski, M. (2019). Socjologia bezpieczeństwa jako subdyscyplina nauk o bezpieczeństwie, Cybersecurity and Law Nr 2(2).
 
4.
Ciesielski, M. (2024). Dyskurs o bezpieczeństwie a media, Cybersecurity and Law Nr 2 (12).
 
5.
Cukier, K., Mayer-Schönberger, V., de Véricourt, F. (2022). Myślenie kontekstowe. Największa przewaga ludzi nad sztuczną inteligencją, MT Biznaes, Warszawa .
 
6.
Heuer, R. J. (2024). Psychology of Intelligence Analysis, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency 1999. Pozycja dostępna na stronie Centralnej Agencji Wywiadowczej chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.cia.gov/resources/... [dostęp: 11.12.2024 r.).
 
7.
Kubera, G. (2024). Mało kto wie, czym zajmuje się firma miliardera. Wśród klientów są CIA i FBI, https://businessinsider.com.pl... [dostęp: 9.12.2024 r.].
 
8.
www.palantir.com/ [dostęp: 9.12.2024 r.).
 
9.
Prokopowicz, D., Gołębiowska, A., Such-Pyrgiel, M. (2023). The role of Big Data and Data Science in the context of information security and cybersecurity, Journal of Modern Science, 53(4):9-42.
 
10.
Wright Mills, C. (2008). Wyobraźnia socjologiczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top