REVIEW PAPER
Legal protection for people with mental disorders
 
More details
Hide details
1
Medical University of Lublin
 
 
Submission date: 2024-08-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-09-02
 
 
Publication date: 2024-10-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk   

Medical University of Lublin
 
 
JoMS 2024;59(Numer specjalny 5):73-82
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The way in which the legal subjectivity of persons with disabilities is understood, which is particularly true for persons with mental disorders, is evolving in the context of the legal institution of incapacitation. First of all, a shift from a substitute decision-making model to a supported decision-making model is suggested. The former involves depriving such persons of their legal (procedural) capacity and placing them under the care or guardianship of others. The latter is to provide them with the appropriate means to access the support they will need in exercising their legal (procedural) capacity. Hence, the legal institution of incapacitation should eventually be abolished and replaced with a new legal instrument of support, which is to be directly based on supportive guardians, representative guardians and legal assistants. The proper protection of the rights of people with mental disorders is obviously possible only within a democratic state of law.
 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Bilikiewicz, T. (1992). Psychiatry, PZWL Publishers, Warsaw, 771.
 
2.
Blaszczak, A. (2014). Poland’s reservations and interpretative statements to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 30–31, 34.
 
3.
Dabrowski , S., Kubicki, L. (1999). Law on Mental Health Protection. A review of major issues, 15. Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw.
 
4.
Duda, J. (2012). A Commentary to the Law on Mental Health Protection, LexisNexis, Warsaw, 77 and the literature cited therein.
 
5.
Gierowski, J. K., Paprzycki, L. K. (2012). Safeguards, in: Paprzycki L. K.(ed.), The System of Criminal Law, vol. 7, C.H. Beck, Warsaw, 156.
 
6.
Gurbai, S. (2014). Limiting or Respecting the Legal Capacity of Adults with Disabilities, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 68.
 
7.
Hart, H. L. A. (1998). The Concept of Law, PWN Law Publishers, Warsaw, 48.
 
8.
Heldrich, A. Steiner, A. (1995). Legal Personality, (in:) International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, vol. IV, Persons and Family, Tübingen, ch. 2, 2–13.
 
9.
Kmiecik, Z. R. (2017). The fate of the madman and the fool in the state and society, Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw, 9, 163–430 and the literature cited therein.
 
10.
Kociucki, L. (2006). The concept of legal capacity of natural persons – structural issues, (in:) Czaplinski, W. (ed.), Law in the 21st Century. A memorial book of the 50th anniversary of the Institute of Legal Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences, SCHOLAR Scientific Publishing House, Warsaw, 364, 369.
 
11.
Korzeniowski, L. Pużyński, S. (eds.) (1972). The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Psychiatry. PZWL Publishers, Warsaw, 132 et seq.
 
12.
Ludwiczak, L. (2015). Guardianship in the Polish legal system, LexisNexis, Warsaw, 18, 21.
 
13.
Pluzinski, S. (2007). Mental illness – problems with the definition and place in diagnosis and legal regulations, No. 3, 306. Psychiatria Polska.
 
14.
Propopienko, A. S. (1997). Biezumnaya psichiatriya. Sevretnye materials about primenienii v SSSR psychiatrii v karatielnykh cel, 16. Sovershenno sekrietno, Moscow.
 
15.
Pudzianowska, D. (2014). Introduction, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, 16, 23.
 
16.
Schott, H., Tölle, R. (2006). Geschichte der Psychiatrie. Krankheitslehren, Irrwege, Behandlungsformen, C.H. Beck, Munich, 177-178.
 
17.
Szeroczyńska, M. (2014). The laborious road to the abolition of the institution of incapacitation, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 164 et seq.
 
18.
Tokarczyk, R. (2005). Philosophy of law, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Publishing House, Lublin, 215–217.
 
19.
Wolter, A. (1958). Directions of changes in Polish family law, vol. 8–9, p. 276. State and Law.
 
20.
Zaradkiewicz, K. (2014). Guardianship – a constitutional perspective vs. a civil law institution, (in:) D. Pudzianowska (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 190–213.
 
21.
Zima-Parjaszewska, M. (2012). Equality of persons with disabilities before the law – the legal situation of incapacitated persons, (in:) Błaszczak, B. (ed.), Key challenges after Poland’s ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Bulletin of the Ombudsman 2012, No. 10, 16 et seq.
 
22.
Zima-Parjaszewska, M. (2014). Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and incapacitation in Poland, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 130.
 
23.
Zima-Parjaszewska, M. (2014). Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and incapacitation in Poland, (in:) Pudzianowska, D. (ed.), Rights of persons with intellectual or mental disabilities in light of international human rights instruments, LEX a Wolters Kluwer Business, Warsaw, 135.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top