Legacy of the integration strategy and the state of
the European Union
More details
Hide details
1
Kırıkkale University,
Department of International Relations
Publication date: 2018-06-30
JoMS 2013;19(4):159-185
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This article outlines the main logic and dynamics behind European integration
and the historical conditions that created it. This is fundamental
to understand the working of the EU, crises it experiences and the future
of integration. One of the main goals of the article is to emphasize the
conditions that shaped the thoughts of the founding fathers of the EU, and
the general approach towards solving Europe’s problems, following WWII.
First, the German factor in European history is highlighted for a better
understanding of European logic of integration. Then, strategies such as
prioritization of economic interests over the political ones, selective forgetting
and selective remembering, focusing on small details to achieve significant
results, legal problem solving for political issues, and emphasizing
soft power approaches, besides ideas like pluralism, are discussed. Here,
a special emphasis was placed on the strategy of using crises as opportunities
to diminish state sovereignty for the sake of integration. The last part
of the article contrasts the integrative logic with the current state of mind
in Europe and discusses the problems caused by the departure from the
European logic, especially in recent decades. In that context, the status of
Turkey and the problems it faces in the accession process are elaborated as
an exemplary case with an emphasis on the Cyprus issue.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Angell, N. (2007) The Great Illusion, New York: Cosimo Classics.
2.
Bachoff, T. (1999) The German Problem Transformed. Institutions, Politics, and Foreign Policy, 1945-1995, University of Michigan.
3.
Ball, G. W. (1991) “Introduction”, Douglas Brinkley and Clifford Hackett (eds.), Jean Monnet: The Path to European Unity, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
4.
Bauman, Z. (1997). Post modernity and Its Discontents, Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
Chase, J.L. (1952) “The Development of the Morgenthau Plan Through the Quebec Conference,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 16, No: 2 pp. 324-359.
6.
Cooper, R. (2012) “Rise of the Greek neo-Nazis: Ultra-right Party Golden Dawn Wants to Force Immigrants into Work Camps and Plant Landmines Along Turkish Border,” Daily Mail, 7 May 2012,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new....
7.
Copenhagen European Council 12 and 13 December 2002, Presidency Conclusions, POLGEN 84, 15917/02, Brussels, 29 January 2003, p. 3,
http://www.consilium.europa.eu....
8.
Coppieters, B., Huysseune, M., Emerson, M., Tocci N., Vahl, M. (2003). European Institutional Models as Instruments of Conflict Resolution In the Divided States of the European Periphery. CEPS Working Document, No 195.
9.
Coppieters, B., Emerson M., Huysseune M., et. al, (2004) Europeanization and Conflict Resolution, Case Studies from the European Periphery, Gent: Academia Press.
10.
Diez, T., Stetter, S., Albert, M., (2006) The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of Integration. International Organization, Vol. 60, No 3 (July 2006), pp. 563-593.
11.
Giannakopoulos, A. (2004). What is to Become of Turkey in Europe? European Identity and Turkey’s EU Accession, Perceptions, pp. 59-72.
12.
Jenkins, R. (1977). Europe’s Present Challenge and Future Opportunity”, President of the Commission of the European Communities, Florence, 27 October 1977,
http://aei.pitt.edu/4404/1/440....
13.
Kagan, R. (2003). Of Paradise and Power: American and Europe in the New World Order, London: Atlantic Books.
15.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol .40 No 2, pp. 235-258.
16.
Michalski, A. (2005). The EU as a Soft Power: the Force of Persuasion,” in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. The New Soft Power in International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 124-144.
17.
Özdemir, H. (2012). Avrupa Mantığı. Avrupa Bütünleşmesinin Teori ve Dinamikleri, Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
18.
Rupnik, J.(ed.) (2011). The Western Balkans and the EU: “The Hour of Europe” Chaillot Papers, 126, European Union Institute for Security Studies. Sarrazin Strikes Again, German Author Says Berlin Is Hostage to Holocaust in Euro Crisis. Der Spiegel International Online, 22 May 2012,
http://www.spiegel.de/internat....
19.
Schlesinger, P. (1992) Europeanness’ – A New Cultural Battleground?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 5, No 2, pp. 11-23.
20.
Spinelli, A., Rossi E. (2003). Ventotene Manifesto, B. F. Nelsen, A. Stubb (ed.), The European Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of the European Integration, Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, s. 3-6.
21.
Tocci, N. (2002). Cyprus and the European Union Accession Process: Inspiration for Peace or Incentive for Crisis?. Turkish Studies, Vol. 3 No 2, pp. 104-138.
22.
Waever, O. (1995). Identity, Integration, and Security. Solving the Sovere ignty Puzzle in the EU Studies,” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 389-431.
23.
The World from Berlin: Merkel’s Rhetoric in Integration Debate is ‘Inexcusable’ Der Spiegel International Online, 18 October 2010,
http://www.spiegel.de/internat....