THE SEX INDUSTRY IN ROMAN LAW: SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION OF PROSTITUTES
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria
 
 
Data nadesłania: 15-06-2018
 
 
Data akceptacji: 05-07-2018
 
 
Data publikacji: 23-07-2018
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
José Luis Zamora Manzano   

Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas, Campus de Tafira, Modulo B-264, 35017 LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA, Spain
 
 
JoMS 2018;37(2):69-93
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
Prostitution in Rome was socially accepted, the lenones were persecuted and their commercial activity and illegal exploitation that vilified women in a situation of vulnerability, a phenomenon that is a historical constant and that unfortunately today continues to reproduce, despite of the remarkable progress in the fight for networks of organized prostitution.In the present papier we will approach the figure of the meretrix from the point of view of a vulnerable group that performed an office under the "double moral" necessary to preserve the purity of the midwives, although it was socially marginalized when it was labelled as disgracefull. We will also see the exploitation suffered by many vulnerable women who were deceived and sexually exploited in brothels and private homes in a criminal network organized by pimps against which, as just like today, we had to fight with measures that the Roman administration undertakes to protect and finish of the sexual market

Material and methods:
The method used is the historical-critical with the analysis of legal and literary sources that refer to the prostitutes in Roman Law

Results:
There is a continuous struggle against organized prostitution from the Roman Law to the present, it is a historical constant

Conclusions:
Observe how there is a parallel between a problem in the past and how, unfortunately, it survives in current law

Licencja
REFERENCJE (22)
1.
Astolfi, R. (1965). “Femina probosa, concubina, mater solitaria”, Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris 31 (Roma), p.15.
 
2.
Biondi, B.,(1952). Il diritto romano cristiano 2, Milano, Giuffrè.
 
3.
Brasiello U.(1937). La repressione penale in diritto romano, Napoli, ed.Jovene.
 
4.
Bravo Bosch, MªJ. (2017). ., Mujeres y símbolos en la Roma republicana: análisis jurídico-histórico de Lucrecia y Cornelia, Madrid, España, Dykinson. ISBN 9788491484455.
 
5.
Catharine E.( 1997). Unspeakable professions: public performance and prostitution in ancient Rome, Roman Sexualities, Princeton. ISBN 9780691011790.
 
6.
Escutia Romero, R. (2010). La difamación pública en Derecho romano, Revista jurídica de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (RJUAM) 22 vol.2. ISSN 1575-720X.
 
7.
Fernández de Buján, A. (2017). La legislación de Augusto, Gerion Revista de Historia Antigua 35, p.87-104. ISSN 0213-0181.
 
8.
Garland L.(1999). Byzantine Empresses, Women and power in Byzantium AD. 527-1204, New york, Routledge. ISBN 0415146887.
 
9.
Harper K.(2013). From shame to sin. The Christian transformation of sexual morality in late antiquity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674660014.
 
10.
Knapp, R.(2011).Invisible Romans, (ed. Los olvidados de Roma. Prostitutas, forajidos, esclavos, gladiadores y gente corriente, trad. J. Paredes), Barcelona: Ariel. ISBN 9788434413955.
 
11.
McGinn Th. A. J. (1998). Prostitution, sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome, Oxford, University Press. ISBN 9780195161328 .
 
12.
McGinn Th. A. J. (2004). The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World: A Study of Social History and the Brothel, Michigan, University of Michigan Press. ISBn 9780472113620.
 
13.
Molina Torres, Mª P. (2016). “La matrona ideal según las fuentes literarias grecorromanas de finales de la República al s. I d.C.”, Espacio Tiempo y forma, II Historia Antigua 29 , p.61 ss. ISSN 1130-1082.
 
14.
Montalbán López, R. (2016). “El oficio más antiguo del mundo”, Revista de estudios de las mujeres, 4, p. 174 ss. ISSN 2340-9630.
 
15.
Neri, V.(1998). I marginali nell´occidente tardoantico. Poveri, infames e criminali nella nascente società cristiana, Bari, Edipuglia SRL. ISBN 9788872282083.
 
16.
Panero Oria, P.(2009). La práctica de la prostitución como práctica de libertad sexual en la antigua Roma”, en Identidades femeninas en un mundo plural, Sevilla, Colección Audem.
 
17.
Panero Oria, P., (2001). Ius occidendi et ius accusandi en la lex iulia de adulteriis coercendis,Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch. ISBN 8484422852.
 
18.
Quintilla Zanuy M. Tª,(2004), “ La interdicción lingüística en las denominaciones latinas para «prostituta»”, Revista de Estudios Latinos (RELat) 4, p. 103-124. ISSN 1578-7486.
 
19.
Rizelli G. (1997). Lex lulia de adulteriis. Studi sulla disciplina di adulterium, lenocinium, stuprum, Lecce, Ed. Grifo. ISBN 9788872611081.
 
20.
Robinson, OF., (1992) Ancient Rome, City planning and administration, London, Routledge. ISBN 978-0415022347.
 
21.
Rodríguez López R. (2018). “Trata de blancas y redes de prostitución forzosa”, en No tan lejano. Una visión de la mujer romana a través de temas de actualidad, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch. ISBN 9788417203702.
 
22.
Vanoyeke V. (1990). La prostitution en grèce et a rome, Paris, Realia. ISBN 9782251338101.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top