About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Review procedure
The procedure of reviewing
Reviewer's form
List of reviewers
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
Terms of the journal
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Implementation of value-oriented project portfolio management for the development of complex system
1
Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
2
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
3
Railway Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
4
Warsaw Management University, Poland
5
John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, Poland
Submission date: 2023-08-15
Final revision date: 2024-03-14
Acceptance date: 2024-03-14
Publication date: 2024-03-28
Corresponding author
JoMS 2024;55(1):405-429
KEYWORDS
strategic goalsorganizational systemdevelopment managementportfolio formationproject portfolio management processessynergetic effect
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to set the problem of forming the optimal value-oriented portfolio of the development of a complex system, taking into account the mutual influence of the components of the portfolio on each other.
Material and methods:
The research used: project portfolio management methods; systems theory and system analysis (for the formalization of value-oriented management processes); mathematical modeling tools (for the formation of basic models of portfolio management).
Results:
This article provides a basic methodological framework for portfolio management of organizational development. The conceptual framework for portfolio management has been formalized, where portfolio management processes are considered as a means of implementing strategic decisions.
Conclusions:
The success of development portfolio management should not only be measured by the economic component, but also by the values that influence the sustainable development of the region. The current legal framework for the design and implementation of public projects in Ukraine is not up to date, as confirmed by the findings of international experts and domestic scientists.
The aim of the article is to set the problem of forming the optimal value-oriented portfolio of the development of a complex system, taking into account the mutual influence of the components of the portfolio on each other.
Material and methods:
The research used: project portfolio management methods; systems theory and system analysis (for the formalization of value-oriented management processes); mathematical modeling tools (for the formation of basic models of portfolio management).
Results:
This article provides a basic methodological framework for portfolio management of organizational development. The conceptual framework for portfolio management has been formalized, where portfolio management processes are considered as a means of implementing strategic decisions.
Conclusions:
The success of development portfolio management should not only be measured by the economic component, but also by the values that influence the sustainable development of the region. The current legal framework for the design and implementation of public projects in Ukraine is not up to date, as confirmed by the findings of international experts and domestic scientists.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Anderson, D. K., & Merna, T. (2003). Project management strategy— Project management represented as a process-based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 387–393.
2.
Archer, N., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999a). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 207–216.
3.
Association of Project Management (APM). (2004). Directing change: A guide to governance of project management. High Wycombe, UK: Association for Project Management.
4.
Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Project complexity in engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739.
5.
Blomquist, T., & Müller, R. (2006). Practices, roles and responsibilities of middle managers in program and portfolio management. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 52–66.
6.
Bushuev, S. D., & Bushueva, N. S. (2005). Modern Approaches to the Development of Project Management Methodologies. In V. A. Rach (Ed.), Project Management and Production Development: Collected Scientific Works (pp. 5-19). (No. 1(13)).
7.
Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., & Amirkhanova, G. Z. (2006). Mechanisms of Trust Formation in Proactive Systems of Organizational Development Programs Management. In V. A. Rach (Ed.), Project Management and Production Development: Collected Scientific Works (pp. 15-23). (No. 3(19)).
8.
Cooper, R., Edgett, S., & Kleinschmidt, E. (1997a). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders I. Research Technology Management, 40(5), 16–28.
9.
Dickinson, M., A. Thornton, and S. Graves (2001) Technology Portfolio Management: Optimizing Interdependent Projects Over Multiple Time Periods, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, V. 48, №4, November.
10.
Don, E. Beck, & Chris, K. Cowan. (2010) Spiral Dynamics: Managing Values, Leadership and Change. Open World, 2010.
11.
Eskerod, P., & Riis, E. (2009). Value creation by building an intraorganizational common frame of reference concerning project management. Project Management Journal, 40 (3), 6–13.
12.
Fricke, S. E., & Shenhar, A. J. (2000). Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47, 258–268.
13.
Handbook for Managing Innovative Projects and Programs: Vol. 1, Version 1.2 (Translated from English, Prof. S. D. Bushuev, Ed.). (2009). Kyiv: Naukovyi svit.
14.
Lenfle, S. (2016). Floating in space? On the strangeness of exploratory projects. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 47–61.
15.
Maniak, R., Midler, C., Lenfle, S., & Le Pellec-Dairon, M. (2014). Value management for exploration projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 55–66.
16.
Martinsuo, M., & Lehtonen, P. (2007). Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 56–65.
17.
Midler, C. (2013). Implementing a low-end disruption strategy through multiproject lineage management: The Logan case. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 24–35.
18.
Pellerin, R., & Perrier, N. (2019). A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and control. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2160–2178.
19.
Pellegrinelli, S., Murray-Webster, R., & Turner, N. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 153–164.
20.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Sixth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
21.
Project Management Institute. (2008). The Standard for Portfolio Management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
22.
Projects for the plan of measures for the implementation of the regional development strategy for 2019-2020 (2021). Retrieved from http://dfrr.minregion.gov.ua/P....
23.
Srivannaboon, S., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 493–505.
25.
Thomas, J., & Mullaly, M. (2007). Understanding the value of project management: First steps on an international investigation in search of value. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 74–89.
26.
Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 1–7.
27.
Winter, M., & Szczepanek, T. (2008). Projects and programmes as value creation processes: A new perspective and some practical implications. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 95–103.
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
