PL EN
 
1/2024 vol. 55
Statystyki
CC BY-SA 3.0
Pobierz cytowanie
Implementation of value-oriented project portfolio management for the development of complex system
Valentyna Michiylovna Molokanova 1
,
 
Vitalii Kuznetsov 2
,
 
Valeriy Kuznetsov 3
,
 
Vitaliy Petrenko 2
,
 
Agnieszka Krol 4
,
 
Zbigniew Ciekanowski 5
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
 
2
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
 
3
Railway Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
 
4
Warsaw Management University, Poland
 
5
John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, Poland
 
 
Data nadesłania: 15-08-2023
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 14-03-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 14-03-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 28-03-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Valentyna Michiylovna Molokanova   

Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
 
 
JoMS 2024;55(1):405-429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/186050
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (27)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
strategic goals
organizational system
development management
portfolio formation
project portfolio management processes
synergetic effect
 
DZIEDZINY
Pedagogika
Nauki o zarządzaniu
 
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The aim of the article is to set the problem of forming the optimal value-oriented portfolio of the development of a complex system, taking into account the mutual influence of the components of the portfolio on each other.

Material and methods:
The research used: project portfolio management methods; systems theory and system analysis (for the formalization of value-oriented management processes); mathematical modeling tools (for the formation of basic models of portfolio management).

Results:
This article provides a basic methodological framework for portfolio management of organizational development. The conceptual framework for portfolio management has been formalized, where portfolio management processes are considered as a means of implementing strategic decisions.

Conclusions:
The success of development portfolio management should not only be measured by the economic component, but also by the values that influence the sustainable development of the region. The current legal framework for the design and implementation of public projects in Ukraine is not up to date, as confirmed by the findings of international experts and domestic scientists.

Licencja
Ta praca jest dostępna na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA)
REFERENCJE (27)
1.
Anderson, D. K., & Merna, T. (2003). Project management strategy— Project management represented as a process-based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 387–393.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Archer, N., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999a). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 207–216.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Association of Project Management (APM). (2004). Directing change: A guide to governance of project management. High Wycombe, UK: Association for Project Management.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Project complexity in engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Blomquist, T., & Müller, R. (2006). Practices, roles and responsibilities of middle managers in program and portfolio management. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 52–66.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bushuev, S. D., & Bushueva, N. S. (2005). Modern Approaches to the Development of Project Management Methodologies. In V. A. Rach (Ed.), Project Management and Production Development: Collected Scientific Works (pp. 5-19). (No. 1(13)).
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., & Amirkhanova, G. Z. (2006). Mechanisms of Trust Formation in Proactive Systems of Organizational Development Programs Management. In V. A. Rach (Ed.), Project Management and Production Development: Collected Scientific Works (pp. 15-23). (No. 3(19)).
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Cooper, R., Edgett, S., & Kleinschmidt, E. (1997a). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders I. Research Technology Management, 40(5), 16–28.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Dickinson, M., A. Thornton, and S. Graves (2001) Technology Portfolio Management: Optimizing Interdependent Projects Over Multiple Time Periods, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, V. 48, №4, November.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Don, E. Beck, & Chris, K. Cowan. (2010) Spiral Dynamics: Managing Values, Leadership and Change. Open World, 2010.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Eskerod, P., & Riis, E. (2009). Value creation by building an intraorganizational common frame of reference concerning project management. Project Management Journal, 40 (3), 6–13.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Fricke, S. E., & Shenhar, A. J. (2000). Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47, 258–268.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Handbook for Managing Innovative Projects and Programs: Vol. 1, Version 1.2 (Translated from English, Prof. S. D. Bushuev, Ed.). (2009). Kyiv: Naukovyi svit.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Lenfle, S. (2016). Floating in space? On the strangeness of exploratory projects. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 47–61.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Maniak, R., Midler, C., Lenfle, S., & Le Pellec-Dairon, M. (2014). Value management for exploration projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 55–66.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Martinsuo, M., & Lehtonen, P. (2007). Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 56–65.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Midler, C. (2013). Implementing a low-end disruption strategy through multiproject lineage management: The Logan case. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 24–35.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Pellerin, R., & Perrier, N. (2019). A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and control. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2160–2178.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Pellegrinelli, S., Murray-Webster, R., & Turner, N. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 153–164.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Sixth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Project Management Institute. (2008). The Standard for Portfolio Management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Projects for the plan of measures for the implementation of the regional development strategy for 2019-2020 (2021). Retrieved from http://dfrr.minregion.gov.ua/P....
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Srivannaboon, S., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 493–505.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Technology of Economic Breakthrough (2020). Retrieved from http://www.compete.org.ua/inde....
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Thomas, J., & Mullaly, M. (2007). Understanding the value of project management: First steps on an international investigation in search of value. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 74–89.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 1–7.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Winter, M., & Szczepanek, T. (2008). Projects and programmes as value creation processes: A new perspective and some practical implications. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 95–103.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top