REVIEW PAPER
Exercise of a party's rights to active participation in administrative proceedings. Selected issues in the context of self-government boards of appeals rulings
 
More details
Hide details
1
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
 
2
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2024-07-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-09-02
 
 
Publication date: 2024-10-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Paweł Smoleń   

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
 
 
JoMS 2024;59(Numer specjalny 5):199-217
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Self-Government Boards of Appeals (SBoAs) act, within their statutory competence, as bodies of higher instance, within the meaning of the Code of Administrative Procedure and the Tax Ordinance Act, in individual public administration matters falling within the jurisdiction of local governments, unless specific provisions of law provide otherwise. In view of this, inevitably, their adjudicatory practice relies, among other things, on the direct application of general principles articulated in the Code of Administrative Procedure and the Tax Ordinance Act, especially in terms of ensuring active participation of the parties in the appeal proceedings. Given the specificity of the court operating as a quasi-judicial body, the article analyses the interplay between the general principles related to active participation of the parties to proceedings and outlines difficulties (and challenges) related to the issues discussed. The study was conducted by employing the formal and dogmatic method, as well as auxiliary legal-historical method, with a view to presenting the normative context of the adopted legal solutions. Moreover, the conduced analysis of court and tribunal jurisprudence allowed inclusion of the practical aspects of the general principles in question and their application.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Adamiak, B. (2001). The influence of systemic concepts on the institutions of procedural administrative law. w: E. Ura (ed.), Jednostka wobec działań administracji publicznej, 11-21. Mitel Publishing House.
 
2.
Adamiak, B., Borkowski, J. (2009). Metodyka pracy sędziego w sprawach administracyjnych. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
 
3.
Borkowski, G. (2005). Effects of a violation of Article 200 § 1 of the Tax Ordinance, 3, 134-140. Glosa.
 
4.
Borkowski, J. (2011). Ordinary Procedure. Subject matter of ordinary Procedure. in: R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel (eds.), System Prawa Administracyjnego. Volume 9: Administrative procedural law, 139-170. CH Beck.
 
5.
Borkowski, J. (2015). Basic principles of administrative Procedure and administrative court Procedure. w: B. Adamiak. J. Borkowski, Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne, 31-54. Wolters Kluwer.
 
6.
Chróścielewski, W., Tarno, J.P. (2016). General principles of the code of administrative procedure. w: W. Chróścielewski, J. P. Tarno, Postępowanie administracyjne i postępowanie przed sądami administracyjnymi, 42-58. Wolters Kluwer.
 
7.
Daniel, P., Wilczyński, J. (2014). Violation of the principle of active participation of a party in administrative Procedure as a premise for the annulment of an act by an administrative court, 3(36), 5-23. Administracja: teoria, dydaktyka, praktyka.
 
8.
Dzwonkowski, H. (2019). Commentary to Article 200 of the Tax Ordinance. w: H. Dzwonkowski (ed.), Tax Ordinance .Commentary, LEX el.
 
9.
Gajda – Durlik, M. (2019). The general principle of active participation of a party in administrative Procedure and the rights of a party in the Procedure in cases settled tacitly, 2(26), 93-114. Public Law Studies.
 
10.
Kędziora, R. (2018). Counteracting the inaction of a public administration body in administrative Procedure, XIII, 15(2), 133-148. Bulletin of the Students and Graduates of the Faculty of Law of the Catholic University of Lublin.
 
11.
Kędziora, R. (2019). Prawnoprocesowe determinanty sprawnego działania organu administracji publicznej w sprawie administracyjnej, XII, 1, 101-111. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN w Lublinie.
 
12.
Klat-Wertelecka, L. (2005). Inaction of a public administration body in administrative Procedure in the era of Europeanization of law. in: Z. Janku, Z. Leoński, M. Szewczyk, M. Waligórski, K. Wojtczak (eds.), Europeization of Polish administrative law, 485-494. Kolonia Limited.
 
13.
Knysiak – Molczyk, H. (2004). The powers of a party in administrative Procedure. Zakamycze. LEX el.
 
14.
Knysiak – Molczyk, H. (2015). Principles of administrative jurisdictional Procedure. w: T. Woś (ed.), Administrative Procedure, 107-131. Wolters Kluwer.
 
15.
Malanowski, J. (2015). Commentary to Article 10 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. in: R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski (eds.), Code of Administrative Procedure. Commentary, 67-70, CH Beck.
 
16.
Muzyczka, K. (2022). The essence of the principle of openness in administrative Procedure. w: T. Bojanowski (ed.), Legal aspects of social control of public administration. Volume I, 63-87. Episteme Scientific Publishing House.
 
17.
Rzepka, M. (2019). Implementation of the principle of equality before the law in administrative Procedure, XIX, 265-278. Annals of Administration and Law.
 
18.
Sawuła, R. (2008). Glosa to the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 3 July 2008, ref. II OSK 754/07, 3, 34-36. Casus.
 
19.
Siedlecki, W. (1972). Postępowanie cywilne w zarysie. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
 
20.
Skibiński, A. (2009). Pozycja ustrojowa samorządowego kolegium odwoławczego, vol. V, 113-135. PWSZ IPiA Studia Lubuskie.
 
21.
Strzępek, Ł. (2023). On some aspects of the meaning of the term rule of law in general administrative Procedure, Vol. 15, 2, 157-173. Law Criticism.
 
22.
Szremski, J. (2021). The right to administrative Procedure and its elements as values arising from constitutional, international and European regulations, 2(42), 35-57. Quarterly of the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution.
 
23.
Tarno, J.P. (2002). Local Government Appeal Colleges – Principles of Representation, vol. LXVI, 9-20. Legal and Economic Studies.
 
24.
Wojciechowska, K. (2020). Exercising the right to inspect the case file in administrative Procedure, 85, 271-287. Studia Iuridica.
 
25.
Zieliński, G. (2022). Implementation of the principles of information and active participation of the party in administrative Procedure during and after the COVID-19 epidemic, 58, 597-612. Studia Prawnoustrojowe.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top