PL EN
ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of selected formal and legal factors on the quality of life of individuals with limited mobility. Study findings
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Labour Law and Social Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
 
2
Department of Economic Law and Commercial Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-12-05
 
 
Publication date: 2024-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Jakub Jan Zięty   

Department of Economic Law and Commercial Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
 
 
JoMS 2024;60(6):232-247
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
Within the framework of the research project entitled “Usefulness of a robotic companion in light of determinants affecting the quality of life of persons with limited mobility”, a survey was conducted among a group of 1,064 respondents aged at least 15 years. One of the objectives of the survey was to determine the subjective assessment of the impact of selected factors of a formal and legal nature on the quality of life of persons with limited mobility. T

Material and methods:
he survey shows that among the respondents, there is a group of several percent of people for whom it is difficult or very difficult to meet a number of formal-legal requirements, such as taking advantage of the tax credit for people with disabilities or obtaining support from the social assistance system.

Results:
In this article, the authors present the results of a survey and identify and evaluate existing legal solutions aimed at supporting people with limited mobility.

Conclusions:
It will be necessary to implement the necessary legislation. It is of particular importance to clearly regulate the responsibility for damage caused by an action (a felony) taken by artificial intelligence in the Polish legal system, especially the rules on which it should be based – fault, risk, or fairness. This is important, especially since individual types of responsibility imply different types of punishment and exemption.

REFERENCES (6)
1.
Bartnicki, M., Suchacki, B. (2019). Komentarz do art. 12 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych. w: K. Antonów (red.), Emerytury i renty z FUS. Emerytury pomostowe. Okresowe emerytury kapitałowe. Komentarz do trzech ustaw emerytalnych, LEX/el, Wolters Kluwer.
 
2.
Mędrala, M. (2020). Społeczny charakter świadczeń w polskim prawie pracy. Wolters Kluwer.
 
3.
Paluszkiewicz, M. (2023). Komentarz do art. 4. w: E. Bielak-Jomaa, E. Staszewska, M. Włodarczyk, T. Wrocławska, M. Paluszkiewicz (red.), Rehabilitacja zawodowa i społeczna oraz zatrudnianie osób z niepełnosprawnościami. Komentarz, LEX/el. Wolters Kluwer.
 
4.
Skiba, W., Siwicki, D. (2021). Deinstytucjonalizacja psychiatrii w Polsce – dwie ścieżki, jeden cel. Analiza porównawcza założeń i pierwszych etapów wdrożenia modeli psychiatrii środowiskowej. Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
 
5.
Sokół-Szawłowska, M. (2021). Mental health impact of quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic, 18 (1), 58-59. Psychiatria.
 
6.
Ziółkowska, A. (2023). Wrażliwość społeczna władzy w kontekście dostępności cyfrowej administracji publicznej. w: S. Dudzik, I. Kawka, R. Śliwa (red.), Obywatel w centrum działań e-administracji w Unii Europejskiej, 125. Wydawnictwo Księgarnia Akademicka.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top