Education - from transmissive teaching to transformative learning
 
More details
Hide details
1
Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie
 
 
Submission date: 2022-04-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-06-01
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-06-01
 
 
Publication date: 2022-07-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Anna Perkowska-Klejman   

Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie
 
 
JoMS 2022;48(1):477-494
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives The aim of the article is to present the changes in the education – from transmissive teaching to transformative learning. Material and methods The article presents the basic assumptions and definitions of learning, teaching and education. Next, the main learning paradigms are shown: transmissive, behavioral, cognitive and constructive. Transformative learning – key to this work, is based on the paradigmatic framework of social constructivism, but it is clearly related to critical theories. Results Transformative learning is presented as the most appropriate educational pattern corresponding to the modern times. The final considerations show transformative learning in relation to contemporary educational, national, European and global regulations. Conclusions Transmissiveness, behaviorism, and cognitivism are not able to cope with contemporary educational challenges. Constructivism and its critical variant can - successfully - meet contemporary educational challenges.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., & Perry, J.D. (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link? W: G.J. Anglin (red.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, s. 17–34.
 
2.
Bloom, B.S. (1980). All Our Children Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
3.
Bloom, B.S i in. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
 
4.
Bialik, M., Fadel Ch. (2015). Skills for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn? Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
 
5.
Binkley, M. i in. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. W: P. Griffin, B. McGaw, E. Care (red.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, s. 17–66. Springer,.
 
7.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
 
8.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (2010). Metody badań jakościowych. Warszawa: PWN.
 
9.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
 
10.
Fullan, M. (2015). The New Meaning of Educational Change, Fifth Edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
11.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
 
12.
Illeris, K. (2006). Trzy wymiary uczenia się. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP.
 
13.
Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism vs constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm. „Educational Technology Research and Development”, No. 39(3), s. 5–14.
 
14.
Kincheloe, J.L. (2005). Critical Constructivism Primer. New York: P. Lang.
 
15.
Krause, A. (2019). Paradygmaty dydaktyki i ich implikacje dla pedagogiki specjalnej – odsłona pierwsza. „Niepełnosprawność. Dyskursy pedagogiki specjalnej”, nr 33, s. 33, 11–25.
 
16.
Kwieciński, Z. (1991), Edukacja jako wartość odzyskiwana wspólnie (Głos w dyskusji o uspołecznieniu szkoły). „Edukacja”, nr 1, s. 88–98.
 
17.
Malewski, M. (2010). Od nauczania do uczenia się. O paradygmatycznej zmianie w andragogice. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
 
18.
McCain, T. (2007). Teaching for tomorrow: Teaching content and problem-solving skills. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
 
19.
Mezirow, J. (1991), Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
20.
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. „Journal of Transformative Education”, No. 1, s. 58–63.
 
21.
Mezirow, J. (2009). Transformative learning theory. W: J. Mezirow, E. Taylor (red.), Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
 
22.
Mezirow, J. (1978) Perspective Transformation. „Adult Education Quarterly”, No. 28, s. 100–110 . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741....
 
23.
Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. „Adult Education Quarterly”, No. 48, s. 185–198.
 
25.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to Think Like an Adult. Core Concepts of Transformation Theory. W: J. Mezirow i in. Learning as Transformation. Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
26.
Milerski, B. Śliwerski, B. (red.). (2000). Pedagogika. Leksykon PWN. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
27.
Muszyński, M. (2014). Edukacja i uczenie się – wokół pojęć. „Rocznik Andragogiczny”, nr 21, s. 78–88.
 
28.
Perkowska-Klejman, A. (2019). Poszukiwanie refleksyjności w edukacji Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
 
29.
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive Development in Children: Development and Learning. „Journal of Research in Science Teaching”, No. 2, s. 176–186. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.....
 
30.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion Press.
 
31.
Schunk, D.H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. London: Macmilla.
 
32.
Snelbecker, G.E. (1983). Learning theory, instructional theory, and psychoeducational design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
33.
Trilling, B., Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
 
34.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1963). Learning and Development at School Age. W: B. Simon, J. Simon (red.). Educational Psychology in the U.S.S.R. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, s. 21–34.
 
35.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1992). Educational Psychology. Florida: St. Lucie Press.
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top