About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Terms of the journal
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Publication procedure
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Terms of the journal
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Disparities in innovation capital of cities in Poland
1
Lublin University of Technology, Department of Management, Lublin, Poland
2
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
Submission date: 2023-11-30
Acceptance date: 2023-12-01
Publication date: 2023-12-18
Corresponding author
JoMS 2023;54(Numer specjalny 5):132-146
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of the paper is to measure innovation capital of Polish cities and verify whether its dispersion changed.
Material and methods:
Data was retrieved from the Local Data Bank provided by Statistics Poland. The sample consists of 18 Polish cities. The research period covers years 2014-2021. The TOPSIS method was applied to build the innovation capital index of cities and sigma convergence of innovation capital was verified.
Results:
The findings indicate relatively high cross-sectional disparities in the vast majority of the investigated indicators of cities’ innovation capital. The largest disparities were identified for the number of higher education graduates and the new registered enterprises in high-tech services sector. The constructed composite indicator - innovation capital index took the highest average values in the analysed period for Wrocław, Poznań, Kraków, Warszawa, and Lublin, whereas Gorzów Wielkopolski, Zielona Góra, Bydgoszcz, and Białystok achieved the lowest values. The sigma convergence analysis revealed that the differentiation of innovation capital in Polish cities remained at a similar level and there was no convergence in this area.
Conclusions:
Innovation capital plays a key role in the development of urban economy. Given the complexity of innovation capital, its measurement should comprise a set of indicators reflecting both output and input dimensions. Identification of spatial patterns of innovation capital distribution should enable to adjust smart specialization strategy to territorial characteristics of a given city.
The aim of the paper is to measure innovation capital of Polish cities and verify whether its dispersion changed.
Material and methods:
Data was retrieved from the Local Data Bank provided by Statistics Poland. The sample consists of 18 Polish cities. The research period covers years 2014-2021. The TOPSIS method was applied to build the innovation capital index of cities and sigma convergence of innovation capital was verified.
Results:
The findings indicate relatively high cross-sectional disparities in the vast majority of the investigated indicators of cities’ innovation capital. The largest disparities were identified for the number of higher education graduates and the new registered enterprises in high-tech services sector. The constructed composite indicator - innovation capital index took the highest average values in the analysed period for Wrocław, Poznań, Kraków, Warszawa, and Lublin, whereas Gorzów Wielkopolski, Zielona Góra, Bydgoszcz, and Białystok achieved the lowest values. The sigma convergence analysis revealed that the differentiation of innovation capital in Polish cities remained at a similar level and there was no convergence in this area.
Conclusions:
Innovation capital plays a key role in the development of urban economy. Given the complexity of innovation capital, its measurement should comprise a set of indicators reflecting both output and input dimensions. Identification of spatial patterns of innovation capital distribution should enable to adjust smart specialization strategy to territorial characteristics of a given city.
License
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Anselin, L., Varga, A., Acs, Z. (2000). Geographical spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective. Growth and Change, 31 (2000), 501-515. doi:10.1111/ 0017-4815.00142.
2.
Athey, G., Nathan, M., Webber, C., Mahroum, S. (2008). Innovation and the city. 10 (2/3), 156–169. Innovation: Management Policy & Practice.
3.
Becattini, G. (2002). Industrial sectors and industrial districts: Tools for industrial analysis. European Planning Studies, 10 (4), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/096543....
4.
Birch, C., Lichy, J., Mulholland, G. Kachour, M. (2017). An enquiry into potential graduate entrepreneurship: Is higher education turning off the pipeline of graduate entrepreneurs? Journal of Management Development, 36 (6), 743-760. doi:10.1108/JMD-03-2016-0036.
5.
Bjornali, E.S., Støren, A. L. (2012). Examining competence factors that encourage innovative behaviour by European higher education graduate professionals, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19 (3), 402-423. doi:10.1108/14626001211250135.
6.
Camagni, R., Capello, R. (2013). Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies. 47 (9), 1383-1402.
7.
Camagni, R., Capello, R. (2002). Milieux Innovateurs and collective learning: From concepts to measurement. In Z. J. Acs, H. L. F. de Groot, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), The emergence of the knowledge economy: A regional perspective (15–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
8.
Crevoisier, O. (2004). The innovative milieus approach: Toward a territorialized understanding of the economy? Economic Geography, 80 (4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944....
9.
Concilio, G., Li, C., Rausell, P., Tosoni, I. (2019). Cities as Enablers of Innovation. In: Concilio, G., Tosoni, I. (eds) Innovation Capacity and the City. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
10.
Duranton, G., Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Handbook of regional and urban economics, Elsevier, 4, 2063-2117.
11.
Feldman, M. P., Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 381–410. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7.
13.
Florida, R., Adler, P., Mellander, C. (2017) The City as Innovation Machine, Regional Studies, 51, 86-96.
14.
Fritsch, M., Wyrwich, M. (2021). Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison, Research Policy, 50 (6), 104237.
15.
Fritsch. M., Slavtchev, V. (2007). Universities and Innovation in Space, Industry and Innovation, 14 (2), 201-218, doi: 10.1080/13662710701253466.
16.
Glaeser, E., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100 (6), 1126–1152.
17.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer.
19.
Kijek, T., Kijek, A., Matras-Bolibok, A. (2023). Innovation and Regional Technological Convergence. SpringerBriefs in Regional Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
20.
Lee, N., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Creativity, cities, and innovation. Environment and Planning a, 46 (5), 1139-1159.
21.
Maliszewski, G., Gromada, M., Nasiłowska, M. (2021). Indeks Millennium 2020. Potencjał Innowacyjności Regionów. Access 23.11.2023 from https://www.bankmillennium.pl/....
22.
Müller, K., Rammer, C., Trüby, J. (2009). The role of creative industries in industrial innovation. Innovation, 11(2), 148-168.
23.
Orankiewicz, A., Turała, M. (2019). The development of cities in Poland—the role of education. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics, 63 (7), 271–285.
24.
Orlando, M. J., Verba, M., Weiler, S. (2019). Universities, agglomeration, and regional innovation. Review of Regional Studies, 49 (3), 407-427.
25.
Sforzi, F. (2015). Rethinking the industrial district: 35 years later. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, 32, 11–29.
26.
Turała, M. (2019). Innovation-based potential for development of cities in Poland. Studia Miejskie, 34, 41–54.
27.
van Wetten, S. J., Gerards, R., de Grip, A. (2020). Are graduates’ intrapreneurial skills optimally used for innovation?. Technovation, 96-97, 102131.
28.
Wixe, S. (2015). The Impact of Spatial Externalities: Skills, Education and Plant Productivity, Regional Studies, 49 (12), 2053-2069, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.891729.
29.
Zwick, T., Frosch, K., Hoisl, K., Harhoff, D. (2017). The power of individual-level drivers of inventive performance. Research policy, 46 (1), 121-137.
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
