Death penalty as a special type of punishment in the context of human rights
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Swps w Warszawie
Submission date: 2020-09-04
Final revision date: 2021-01-13
Acceptance date: 2021-01-13
Publication date: 2021-01-18
JoMS 2020;45(2):287-310
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
Compilation and comparison of the period when the death penalty was applied, its functions and significance, to the present day, when the death penalty has been abolished.
Material and methods:
Legal acts, jurisdictions, literature, Internet sources. Analytical method used.
Results:
the result of my article is to familiarize readers with the death penalty and its understanding by past and present societies.The death penalty initially served several functions, it was not only a function to punish the offender. Depending on the understanding of crime, it was treated as revenge of the gods or private revenge, or as public retaliation or as a means of social defense.The original reaction to the crime was revenge, aimed at destroying the offender and his property, and was not always directed against the perpetrator, most often consisting in removing a member from a social union by death or expulsion from the group (alienation).In the course of social development, the punishment took the form of a material talion, which consisted in doing the same evil to the perpetrator as he had done.With the development of humanitarianism in legal systems, the punishment from a primitive social reaction turned into a state punishment, subject to gradual rationalization.
Conclusions:
All aspects of the applied penalties for committed crimes, including the death penalty, presented in the article, are important for legal and moral considerations made by the society and, consequently, should lead to a referendum on the use of the death penalty in Poland.Currently, Poland and most countries do not use the death penalty in their sentences and do not recognize it in the code. It is a more humane approach to the criminal, but the Polish government is working on a further amendment to the penal code in favor of the victims.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Bartusiak B. (2011), Kara śmierci w świetle sporu o racjonalizację kary śmierci [Death penalty in the light of the dispute on the rationalization of the death penalty], Warszawa: C.H. Beck. ISBN 9788325512835.
2.
Hołda Z. (1996), Ochrona praw człowieka [Protection of human rights], Lublin: UMCS. ISBN 832270951X.
3.
Jasudowicz T (2010)., Prawo do życia [Right to life], [in:] B. Gronowska i in., Prawa człowieka i ich ochrona [Human rights and their protection], Toruń: TNOiK. ISBN 9788372855060.
4.
Juhacz W., Zgoliński I. (2014), Aktualny model kary pozbawienia wolności i jego perspektywy, Studia z zakresu nauk prawnoustrojowych. Miscellanea nr 4. [Current model of imprisonment and its perspectives, Studies in the field of Law Sciences. Miscellanea No. 4]. ISSN 1899-4601.
5.
Lang M. (2015), Kara śmierci a prawa człowieka, Studia z zakresu nauk prawnoustrojowych. Miscellanea, nr. 5 [Death penalty and human rights, Studies in the field of legal systems. Miscellanea, No. 5].
6.
Mrozek J.J. (2014), Godność osoby ludzkiej jako źródło praw człowieka i obywatela, Civitas et Lex, nr 1. [Dignity of the human person as a source of human and citizen rights, Civitas et Lex, No. 1]. ISSN 2449-5522.
7.
Niewiadomska I. (2016), Osobowościowe uwarunkowania skuteczności kary pozbawienia wolności [Personality determinants of the effectiveness of imprisonment], Lublin: KUL. ISBN 9788373635722.
8.
Osiatyński W. (2011), Prawa człowieka i ich granice [Human rights and their limits], Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Znak,. ISBN 9788324015139.
9.
Pohl Ł. (2015), Prawo karne: wykład części ogólnej [Criminal law. Lecture of the general part], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 9788326494109.
10.
Sokołowski T (2004)., Międzynarodowa ochrona praw człowieka: zarys [International protection of human rights. Outline]., Warszawa: WSP im. Janusza Korczaka. ISBN 8388278576.
11.
Stefański R.A. (2009), Prawo karne materialne. Część ogólna [Substantive criminal law. General part], Warszawa: Difin. ISBN 9788372519245.
12.
Warylewski J. (2017), Prawo karne. Część ogólna [Criminal law. General part], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 9788381076876.
13.
Wieruszewski R. (2010), Międzynarodowe zobowiązania Polski dotyczące abolicji [International commitments of Poland regarding abolition] [in:] Śmierć nie jest sprawiedliwością. Europa przeciwko karze śmierci, [Death is not a righteousness. Europe against the death penalty, Information Office of the Council of Europe], Warszawa: Biuro Informacji Rady Europy. ISBN 9788360216064.
14.
Wieruszewski R. (2012), Międzynarodowy Pakt Praw Obywatelskich (Osobistych) i Politycznych. Komentarz [International Covenant on Civil (Personal) and Political Rights. Commentary], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 9788326439339.
15.
Wróbel W., Zoll A. (2013), Polskie prawo karne. Część ogólna [Polish Criminal Law. General Part], Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak. ISBN 9788324021574.