Connected or Set Apart? Academic Youth about Their Ties with the Mother and the Father
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Institute of Sociological Sciences
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
Data nadesłania: 03-04-2023
Data ostatniej rewizji: 20-06-2023
Data akceptacji: 23-06-2023
Data publikacji: 29-07-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Anna Linek
Institute of Sociological Sciences
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
JoMS 2023;51(2):609-626
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The study’s main research goal was to illustrate how young adults assess the ties with their parents and the support (or lack thereof) received from them and discussion of the result in light of worldwide research.
Material and methods:
The survey was conducted in the spring of 2020 with CAWI on a purposefully selected sample of academic youth aged 18–29 from over 30 Polish universities (N = 621). The results were discussed in the light of worldwide research.
Results:
Most young people assessed their ties with the parents and parental support positively, especially from the perspective of stability and satisfaction.But important differences were noticeable: the ties with the mother were evaluated more positively. The ties with the father were assessed as weaker, especially regarding expressions of affection, honest and open communication, and trust and care. Similarly, when assessing parental support, the mother turned out more involved and her support did not depend on other factors.
Conclusions:
Most academic youth have stable and satisfying ties with parents, and they are supported by parents in difficult times. Young people highly assessed the quality of the bond with the mother. The relationship with the father was assessed as similarly stable and satisfactory, but this was a lower response share than with the relationship with the mother. Other dimensions of the relationship with the father were assessed even less positively. Similarly, when respondents were evaluating parental support, the mother turned out more involved than the father.
Data from international studies show that macroeconomic factors and social policy strongly influence the ties between adults and their parents. Researchers from other countries also notice that young people have stronger bonds with the mother than with the father.
REFERENCJE (32)
1.
Argyle, M. (1994). The Psychology of Interpersonal Behavior, Penguin Books, London.
2.
Arnett J.J. (2004). Emerging Adulthood. The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3.
Beck U. (2002). Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W Drodze do Innej Nowoczesności [A Society of Risk. On the Road to Another Modernity], Scholar, Warsaw.
4.
Billari F.C., Liefbroer A.C. (2010). Towards a New Pattern of Transition to Adulthood, no. 15, 59-75. Advances in Life Course Research.
5.
Bieńko M. (2017). Dorosłe Dzieci Mieszkające z Rodzicami – Refleksyjny Obraz Siebie [Adult Children Living with Parents – A Self-Reflecting Image], in: Bieńko M., Kwak A., Rosochacka-Gmitrzak M., Wciąż Jeszcze w Gnieździe Rodzinnym? Socjologiczne Spojrzenie na Młodych Dorosłych [Still in the Family Nest? A Sociological Outlook on Young Adults], 39-96. Maria Grzegorzewska University (APS) Press, Warsaw.
6.
Bieńko M., Kwak A., Rosochacka-Gmitrzak M. (2017). Wciąż Jeszcze w Gnieździe Rodzinnym? Socjologiczne Spojrzenie na Młodych Dorosłych [Still in the Family Nest? A Sociological Outlook at Young Adults], Maria Grzegorzewska University (APS) Press, Warsaw.
7.
Braun-Gałkowska M. (1992). Psychologiczna Analiza Systemów Rodzinnych Osób Zadowolonych i Niezadowolonych z Małżeństwa [A Psychological Analysis of Family Systems of People Happy and Unhappy about Their Marriage], Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin.
8.
Erikson E.H. (1963). Childhood and Society, W. W. Norton, New York.
9.
Fingerman K.L. (2017). Millennials and Their Parents: Implications of the New Young Adulthood Form Midlife Adults, Innovations in Ageing, Oxford University Press. Accessed 08.08 2021 from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....
10.
Fingerman K.L., Cheng Y.P., Tighe L., Birditt K.S., Zarit S. (2012). Relationships between Young Adults and Their Parents, in: A. Booth, S.L. Brown, N.S. Landale, W.D. Manning, S.M. McHale (eds.), Early Adulthood in a Family Context, National Symposium of Family Issues, 59-86. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, Accessed 08.08. 2021 from
http://sites.utexas.edu/adultf....
11.
Gałęska U. (2014). Przeobrażenia Więzi Rodzinno-Społecznych w Rodzinie XXI Wieku, [Transformations of Family and Social Ties among the 21st Century Families], No. 1, Vol. XI, 27-41. Wychowanie w Rodzinie [Family Upbringing]. Accessed 10.10. 2020 from
http://www.repozytorium.uni.wr....
12.
Grzelak Sz., Siellawa-Kolbowska E., Łuczka M., Trafny M., Grzelak A. (2020). Młodzież w Czasie Epidemii, Raport Instytutu Profilaktyki Zintegrowanej [Youth During the Pandemic, Report of the Institute for Integrated Prevention]. Accessed 06.11. 2020 from
http://edukacja.gdynia.pl/wp-c....
13.
Kawińska M., Wróblewska-Skrzek J., Linek A. (2020). Wolność Wyboru czy Przymus Zwyczaju. Młodzież Akademicka w Dobie Pandemii o Związkach, Intymności i Więziach Rodzinnych [Freedom of Choice or Compulsion of Custom: Academic Youth in the Times of the Pandemic on Relationships, Intimacy, and Family Ties], Vol. I, Rys, Poznań.
14.
Kluczyńska U. (2008). Nowe Ojcostwo w Kontekście Przemian Męskości w Kulturze Współczesnej [New Fatherhood in the Context of Changes of Masculinity in the Contemporary Culture], in: W. Muszyński, E. Sikora (eds.), Miłość, Wierność i Uczciwość na Rozstajach Współczesności. Kształty Rodziny Współczesnej [Love, Fidelity, and Honesty on the Crossroads of the Present Day. The Shapes of the Contemporary Family], 170-186. Adam Marszałek Press, Toruń.
15.
Kotlarska-Michalska A. (2011). Społeczne Role Kobiet [Women’s Social Roles], Edukacja Humanistyczna [Humanist Education], No. 1/24, 25-35.
16.
Kotlarska-Michalska A. (2016). Role Rodzinne a Więzi w Rodzinie [Family Roles and Family Ties], in: I. Przybył, A. Żurek (eds.), Role Rodzinne. Między Przystosowaniem a Kreacją [Family Roles. Between Adjustment and Creation], 49-61. Institute of Social Sciences at Adam Mickiewicz University Academic Press, Poznań.
17.
Kotlarska-Michalska A. (2020). Czynniki Kształtujące Współczesną Rolę Matki, [Factors Shaping the Contemporary Role of the Mother] in: M. Bieńko, M. Rosochacka-Gmitrzak, E. Wideł (eds.), Obrazy Życia Rodzinnego i Intymności [Images of Family Life and Intimacy], 237-256. University of Warsaw Press, Warsaw.
18.
Levinson, D. J. (1990). A Theory of Life Structure Development in Adulthood, in: C. N. Alexander & E. J. Langer (eds.), Higher Stages of Human Development: Perspectives on Adult Growth, 35-53. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19.
Melosik Z. (2002). Kryzys Męskości w Kulturze Współczesnej [The Crisis of Masculinity in the Contemporary Culture], Wolumin, Poznań.
20.
Miller J.B., Lane M. (1991). Relations between Young Adults and Their Parents, vol. 14 Issue 2, June, 179-194. Journal of Adolescence,.
21.
Mitchell B.A. (2006). The Boomerang Age from Childhood to Adulthood: Emergent Trends and Issues for Aging Families, Vol. 33.2, 2006, 155-178. Canadian Studies in Population,.
22.
Newman, K. & Aptekar, S. (2006). Sticking Around: Delayed Departure from the Parental Nest Western Europe, PA: University of Pennsylvania, MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Transitions to Adulthood Policy Brief, Philadelphia.
23.
Rathus, S. A. (2013). Psychology: Concepts & Connections. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Australia.
24.
Santoro M. (2011). The Transition to Adulthood in Europe: A Comparison of Different Models, no 1(3), 161-178. Sociology Study ISSN.
25.
Slany K. (2020). Różnorodność Typów Rodzin, Różnorodność Praktyk w Rodzinach, [A Variety of Family Types, a Variety of Practices within Families] in: M. Bieńko, M. Rosochacka-Gmitrzak, E. Wideł (eds.), Obrazy Życia Rodzinnego i Intymności [Images of Family Life and Intimacy], 19-29. Warsaw University Press, Warsaw.
26.
Sroczyńska M. (2016). Ciągłość i Przeobrażenia Więzi Rodzinnej we Współczesnym Społeczeństwie Polskim (Wzory Kobiecości i Męskości) [Continuity and Transformations of Family Ties in the Contemporary Polish Society (Models of Femininity and Masculinity)], in: D. Gizicka (ed.), Małżeństwo, Rodzina, Rodzicielstwo. Przemiany we Współczesnej Polsce [Marriage, Family, Parenthood. Transformations in the Contemporary Poland], 95-112. John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Press, Lublin.
27.
Szlendak T. (2009). O Naskórkowej (lub Kosmetycznej) Przemianie Męskości [On the Superficial Transformation of Masculinity], in: M. Sikorska (ed.), Być Rodzicem we Współczesnej Polsce. Nowe Wzory w Konfrontacji z Rzeczywistością [To Be a Parent in the Contemporary Poland. New Patterns as Confronted with Reality], 62-76. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
28.
Szyszka M. (2020). Znaczenie Małżeństwa i Rodziny Współcześnie [The Meaning of Marriage and Family Today], in: M. Bieńko, M. Rosochacka-Gmitrzak, E. Wideł (eds.), Obrazy Życia Rodzinnego i Intymności [Images of Family Life and Intimacy], 57-68. Warsaw University Press, Warsaw.
29.
Tyszka Z. (2002). Rodzina we Współczesnym Świecie [Family in the Contemporary World], Adam Mickiewicz University Academic Press, Poznań.
30.
Uklańska K., Kotowska-Wójcik O., Choczyński M. (2020). Młodzież akademicka w dobie pandemii o sensie życia, relacjach i planach życiowych [Freedom of Choice or Compulsion of Custom: Academic Youth in the Times of the Pandemic on the Meaning of Life, Relationships, and Life Plans], Vol III, Rys, Poznań.
31.
Zaręba S.H., Sroczyńska M., Klimski W. (2020). Wolność wyboru czy przymus zwyczaju? Młodzież akademicka w dobie pandemii o religii, duchowości i moralności [Freedom of Choice or Compulsion of Custom: Academic Youth in the Times of the Pandemic on Religion, Spirituality, and Morality], Vol II, Rys, Poznań.
32.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Coulombe, N. D. (2015). Man (Dis)connected: How Technology Has Sabotaged What It Means to Be Male, London: Rider Books.