ORIGINAL PAPER
Beyond the hype: a decision support framework for promoting critical thinking about the rationality of management practices
 
More details
Hide details
1
Politechnika Łódzka, Instytut Zarządzania (Łódz Univeristy of Technology, Institute of Management)
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-15
 
 
Publication date: 2024-06-27
 
 
Corresponding author
Konrad Kulikowski   

Politechnika Łódzka, Instytut Zarządzania (Łódz Univeristy of Technology, Institute of Management)
 
 
JoMS 2024;56(2):465-479
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
In an era of management hype, where management concepts and techniques quickly become buzzwords within the business community (e.g., chat GPT, Artificial Intelligence, pay transparency or Industry 5.0), the crucial skill of a manager is the ability to think critically about the rationality of all those new shiny management practices. To stimulate this, we present a heuristic decision support framework to assist managers in thinking more critically about management fashions - management practices that are intensively promoted and attract public attention but merely imitate rationality and progress.

Material and methods:
We employ a method of conceptual analysis, drawing from Abrahamson's management fashion theory, self-determination theory, literature on management fads and evidence-based management.

Results:
The proposed decision-making support framework presents a decision tree based on three steps to evaluate management practices' rationality, involving critical thinking about their goals, importance, and efficiency.

Conclusions:
The framework can be used not only to assist managerial decision-making but also to teach management students to think more critically and to empower the business community to question the rationality of mainstream management practices. Our decision support framework might act as a vaccine for the so-called shiny object syndrome, the tendency to chase novel, popular, or exciting management practices without evaluating if they deliver what they promise.

 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586-612.
 
2.
Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254-285.
 
3.
Aguinis, H., & Cronin, M. A. (2022). It’s the theory, stupid. Organizational Psychology Review,.
 
4.
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia computer science, 44, 669-678.
 
5.
Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. Kogan Page Publishers.
 
6.
Brickley, J. A., Smith Jr, C. W., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1997). Management fads and organizational architecture. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 10(2), 24-39.
 
7.
Christensen, L. T., Kärreman, D., & Rasche, A. (2019). Bullshit and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1587-1600.
 
8.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1999). Cognitive biases and strategic decision processes: An integrative perspective. Journal of management studies, 36(6), 757-778.
 
9.
Drucker, P. F. (1963). Managing for business effectiveness. Harvard Business Review, 41(3), 53–60.
 
10.
González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 159-169.
 
11.
Grote, G., & Cortina, J. M. (2018). Necessity (not just novelty) is the mother of invention: Using creativity research to improve research in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), 335-341.
 
12.
Hills, L. (2022). Management Fads: How to Resist Shiny Object Syndrome. Physician Leadership Journal, 9(6), 57-63.
 
13.
Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 23.
 
14.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.
 
15.
Kulikowski, K. (2021). The model of evidence-based benchmarking: A more robust approach to benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(2), 721-736.
 
16.
Kulikowski, K. (2022). Cognitive biases policy (CBP) in performance improvements–the example of benchmarking. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1297-1311.
 
17.
Levenson A. (2017), Beware the HR analytic barbarians https://www.linkedin.com/pulse....
 
18.
Miller, D., & Hartwick, J. (2002). Spotting management fads. Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 26-7.
 
19.
Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2002). The performance implications of management fads and fashions: an empirical study. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10(1), 47-68.
 
20.
Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation bias. In R.F. Pohl (eds.) Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory, (pp. 79-97).
 
21.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard Business Press.
 
22.
Phillips Carson, P., Lanier, P. A., Carson, K. D., & Birkenmeier, B. J. (1999). A historical perspective on fad adoption and abandonment. Journal of Management History, 5(6), 320-333.
 
23.
Piazza, A., & Abrahamson, E. (2020). Fads and fashions in management practices: Taking stock and looking forward. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(3), 264-286.
 
24.
Pollach, I. (2022). The diffusion of management fads: A popularization perspective. Journal of Management History, 28(2), 284-302.
 
25.
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive science, 26(5), 521-562.
 
26.
Spicer A. (2018) If We All Hate Business Jargon, Why Do We Keep Using It? Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2018/02/if-we-....
 
27.
Taylor, J. (2012). Fads and fancies: The Use of New Management tools in UK universities. Excellence in Higher Education, 3(1), 1-13.
 
28.
Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99-109.
 
29.
Williams, R. (2004). Management fashions and fads: Understanding the role of consultants and managers in the evolution of ideas. Management decision. 42(6), 769-780.
 
30.
Zorn, T. E. (2017). Management fashion/fad. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, Available online https://doi.org/10.1002/978111....
 
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top