PL EN
 
6/2024 vol. 60
Statystyki
CC BY-SA 3.0
Pobierz cytowanie
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Analysis of education managment approaches in innovative markets on the international stage. Strategies for combining pedagogy and management on the modern school.
Grzegorz Paweł Świecarz 1
,
 
Ireneusz Miciuła 2
,
 
Agnieszka Wójcik – Czerniawska 3
,
 
Henryk Wojtaszek 4
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
WSGE University of Applied Sciences in Józefów, Poland
 
2
University of Szczecin
 
3
SGH Warsaw School of Economics
 
4
College of Vocational Education Faculty of Social Sciences in Wrocław Institute of Psychology
 
 
Data nadesłania: 10-09-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 07-12-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 29-12-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Grzegorz Paweł Świecarz   

Alcide De Gasperi University of Euroregional Economy in Józefów, Poland
 
 
JoMS 2024;60(6):866-880
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/197009
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (30)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
integrated approach
education management
innovative strategies
methods
education
management
 
DZIEDZINY
Pedagogika
Psychologia
Nauki o zarządzaniu
 
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives:
The article focuses on the importance of integrating educational management with pedagogical methods. To achieve the research objectives, the method of review of Polish and foreign literature and tabular comparisons of different educational systems was used.

Material and methods:
The article emphasizes that effective education management requires not only administrative skills, but also a deep understanding of pedagogical processes. By combining these two areas, the educational system can be more effectively adapted to the needs of students and the challenges of today. Tabular comparisons presented different educational systems in the context of their management strategies and pedagogical approaches, allowing for a deeper understanding of global trends in education management.

Results:
The article also points to the need for continuous development and adaptation of educational systems, taking into account the changing social, technological and economic realities. To meet the challenges of the 21st century, these systems must be flexible and innovative.

Conclusions:
In conclusion, the integration of educational management with pedagogy is essential for creating modern, effective and accountable educational systems. This approach can benefit teachers, students and the communities in which educational institutions operate.

Licencja
Ta praca jest dostępna na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA)
REFERENCJE (30)
1.
Ahn, R., Catbagan, P., Tamayo, K., I, J. Y., Lopez, M., & Walker, P. (2015). Successful minority pedagogy in mathematics: US and Japanese case studies. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 87-102.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Choudaha, R., & van Rest, E. (2018). Envisioning future pathways for global higher education and international student mobility through 2030: Trends, challenges, and the digital technology impact. Global Education Review, 25(3), 243-261. (SpringerLink).
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Clark, A. (2006). Teaching the nation: politics and pedagogy in Australian history. History Teacher, 44(1), 16-18.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
De Araujo, A. M. P., & Slomski, V. G. (2013). Active learning methods—an analysis of applications and experiences in Brazilian accounting teaching. Creative Education, 4(12), 20.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Deák, C., Kumar, B., Szabó, I., Nagy, G., & Szentesi, S. (2021). Evolution of new approaches in pedagogy and STEM with inquiry-based learning and post-pandemic scenarios. Education Sciences, 11(7), 319.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpiński, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). Reflecting on the potential impacts of COVID-19 on education: Pandemics and their influence on global educational systems and pedagogical methods. Journal of Global Education and Technology, 15(2), 88-107. (Globalization of Markets).
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde, M. Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Alier-Forment, M., et al. (2017). The role of learning ecosystems in education: Leveraging collaborative and technologically enriched environments for the knowledge society. Educational Technology & Society Journal, 20(1), 35-49. (Oxford Academic).
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Globalization’s Impact on Education (2020). Accessing international educational resources and promoting academic mobility through online platforms. World Education Journal, 17(2), 112-130. (Globalization of Markets).
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Gros, B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Future trends in e-learning: Design strategies and technological affordances. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(4), 320-335. (SpringerLink).
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., & Nihill, C. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Knauf, H. (2020). Documentation strategies: Pedagogical documentation from the perspective of early childhood teachers in New Zealand and Germany. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1), 11-19.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Kolâs, L., Nordseth, H., & Munkvold, R. (2016). Learning with educational apps: A qualitative study of the most popular free apps in Norway. In 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Leme, M. C., Louzano, P., Ponczek, V., & Souza, A. P. (2012). The impact of structured teaching methods on the quality of education in Brazil. Economics of Education review, 31(5), 850-860.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Lin, S. Y., & Scherz, S. D. (2014). Challenges facing Asian international graduate students in the US: Pedagogical considerations in higher education. Journal of International Students, 4(1), 16-33.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Minniti, L. F. S., Melo Jr, J. S. M., Oliveira, R. D., & Salles, J. A. A. (2017). The use of case studies as a teaching method in Brazil. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 373-377.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Mishra, S., & Nargundkar, R. (2015). An analysis of intensive mode pedagogy in management education in India. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(4), 408-419.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206-221.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Mukhamedov, G., Khodjamkulov, U., Shofkorov, A., & Makhmudov, K. (2020). Pedagogical education cluster: content and form. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 1(81), 250-257.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Naik, G. L., Deshpande, M., Shivananda, D. C., Ajey, C. P., & Manjunath Patel, G. C. (2021). Online Teaching and Learning of Higher Education in India during COVID-19 Emergency Lockdown. Pedagogical Research, 6(1).
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Pache, A. C., & Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494-510.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Raman, A. (2013). Innovative Pedagogical methods for Imparting Management Education to Indian Students. International Journal of Computing, Communications and Networking.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Singhal, A., Perez, L. E., Stevik, K., Mønness, E., & Svenkerud, P. J. (2020). Liberating structures as pedagogical innovation for inclusive learning: A pilot study in a Norwegian university. Journal of Creative Communications, 15(1), 35-52.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463-478.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Stephens, P., Egil tønnessen, F., & Kyriacou, C. (2004). Teacher training and teacher education in England and Norway: a comparative study of policy goals. Comparative Education, 40(1), 109-130.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Suresh, V., & Kolluru, M. (2022). Pedagogy innovation for management graduates: application of design thinking. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3/4), 659-674.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Takahashi, A. (2021). Teaching mathematics through problem-solving: A pedagogical approach from Japan. Routledge.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Wojtaszek, H, Miciuła, I. (2019). Analysis of Factors Giving the Opportunity for Implementation of Innovations on the Example of Manufacturing Enterprises in the Silesian Province” Sustainability 11, no. 20: 5850.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Victorelli, G., Flório, F. M., Ramacciato, J. C., Motta, R. H. L., & de Souza Fonseca Silva, A. (2014). Impact of pedagogical method on Brazilian dental students’ waste management practice. Journal of Dental Education, 78(11), 1528-1533.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
Multidimensional comparative analysis of the number of students in Poland with the view to the demographic crisis and its impact on social security
Ideał jako kategoria pedagogiczna
Artificial Intelligence and Social-Emotional Learning: what relationship?
Normative determinants of effective management of municipal resources
Educating on emotions for effective learning
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top