About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Terms of the journal
Indexing
Licenses & Access
Archive
For Authors
Publishing Policy
Technical instruction for the authors
Agreement CC BY-SA
Copyright statement
Publication procedure
Contact
About the Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Scientific Council
Reviewers
Ethical Code
Special Issue
GDRP - information on the processing of personal data
Terms of the journal
Indexing
Licenses & Access
A state and the protection of its interests. Advocatus fisci vs State Treasury Solicitors’ Office
1
SWPS University of Social Sciences and
Humanities
Publication date: 2017-06-30
JoMS 2017;33(2):49-60
KEYWORDS
protection of the interests of the TreasuryRoman lawpublic lawadvocate fiscithe State Treasury Solicitors’ Office
ABSTRACT
The modern concept of the state dates its roots to the beginning of the Renaissance.
Created at that time, the concept of ‘the national interest’ realized the existence
of a sphere of rights and interests of a particular country, which must be protected
in a particular way. To this end, national bodies responsible for protecting the
rights and interests of the state were established. Despite the different conception of
the state, the origins of institutions dealing with the legal protection of interests and
rights of the state can be found in the Roman institution advocates fisci. Even then,
numerous provisions governing the organization and functioning of the institution
arose. In Poland the institution which deals with this king of protection is the State
Treasury Solicitors’ Office. The object of this elaboration is to identify similarities and
differences between those two institutions.
License
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Bałaban, A. (1988). Theorie moderner sozialistischer Verfassungen, [in:] Häberle P. (ed.), Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 37, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 13–34. ISBN 9783166454610.
2.
Bolla-Kotek, von S. (1938). Die Entwicklung des Fiskus zum Privatrechtssubjekt mit Beiträge zur Lehre vom Aerarium, Prag: Roland Verlag. ISBN 3406006302.
4.
Brunt, P.A. (1966). The ‟fiscus” and its Development, The Journal of Roman Studies, No. 56, p. 75–91. ISSN 0075-4358.
5.
Brzęk, W. (2006). Prokuratoria Generalna Skarbu Państwa – historia i stan dzisiejszy, „Journal of Modern Science” 1/2, s. 20–39. ISSN 1734-2031.
6.
Chicca, G. (1964). Il fiscus e le attribuzioni del suo advocatus nell'ordinamento romano, [in:] ‟Revue Internationale Du Droit D’auteur Rida” No. 11, p. 141–149. ISSN 0035-3515.
7.
Giuffré, V. (1976). Papiniano: tra tradizione ed innovazione, ‟Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt ANRW”, vol. II/15, p. 632–666.
8.
Herrlich, S. (1872). De aerario et fisco Romanorum quaestiones, Berolini: Typis expressit Gustavus Lange.
9.
Hirschfeld, O. (1905). Die kaiserlichen Verwaltungsbeamten bis auf Diocletian, Berlin: Weidmann (rist. 1963).
10.
Humbert, V. (1877). s.v. Advocatus fisci, [in:] Ch. Daremberg, E. Saglio (eds.), Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines, I, 1, Paris: Hachette, col. 90.
11.
Izdebski, H. (1995). Historia myśli politycznej i prawnej, Warszawa: C.H. Beck. ISBN 8371100566.
12.
Juros, H. (1998). Ochrona środowiska naturalnego a redefinicja państwa, [w:] R. Sobański (red.), Prawa człowieka w państwie ekologicznym, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Teologii Katolickiej, s. 68–69. ISBN 8370721168.
14.
Kieliszek, Z. (2010). Państwo sprawiedliwe według Immanuela Kanta, [w:] B. Kruszewska, P. Polaczuk, L. Świto (red.), Sprawiedliwość. Wybrane koncepcje, Olsztyn: Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego, s. 27–60. ISBN 9788362383047.
15.
Lambrini, P. (1993). In tema di „advocatus fisci” nell’ordinamento Romano, ‟Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor SDHI”, No. 59, p. 325–336. ISSN 0191-2917.
16.
Lopéz Melero, R., Plácido, D., Presedo, F. (1992). Historia universal. Edad Antigua. Grecia y Oriente Próximo, Barcelona: Rústica editorial. ISBN 9788431630911.
17.
Millar, F. (1963). The fiscus in the First Two Centuries, ‟Journal of Roman Studies”, No. 53, p. 29–42. ISSN 0075-4358.
18.
Mitteis, L. (1908). Römisches Privatrecht bis auf die Zeit Diokletians, I, Leipzig: Leipzig Duncker & Humbolt.
19.
Nardi, E. (1937). I casi di indegnitànel diritto successorio romano, Milano: A. Giuffrè.
20.
Petrucci, A. (2012). Corso di diritto pubblico Romano, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. ISBN 9788834836026.
21.
Pflaum, H.G. (1950). Les procurateurs équestres sous le haut-empire romaine, Paris: Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient, Adrien Maisonneuve.
22.
Provera, V. (1964). La vindicatio caducorum. Contributo allo studio del processo fiscale romano, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.
23.
Pugliese, G. (1948). Processo privato e processo pubblico. Contributo all’individuazione dei loro caratteri nella storia del diritto romano, Rivista di diritto 3(1948), p. 98–104. ISSN 1720-3694.
24.
Puliatti, S. (1992). Il "De iure fisci" dei Callistrato e il processo fiscale in età severiana, Milano: A. Giuffrè. ISBN 9788814037344.
25.
Raggi, L. (1964). La restitutio in integrum nel sistem cognitorio di valutazioni plurime della decisione giudiziale, ‟Annali Macerata”, No. 27, p. 243–282.
26.
Sitek, B., Jurewicz, A. i in. (red.) (2011). Rzymskie prawo publiczne. Wybrane zagadnienia, Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski. ISBN 9788372997371.
27.
Sobański, R. (1979). Kościół – prawo – zbawienie, Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka.
28.
Spagnuolo Vigorita, T. (1985). Praesente fisci patrono, [in:] Giuffrè A. (ed.) Sodalitas. Scritti in onore di Antonio Guarino, Volume 3, Napoli: Jovene, p. 1119–1130.
29.
Wojciechowska Bianco, B. (1988). La concezione ciceroniana dello stato in Montaigne, ‟Quaderni”, No. 10, p. 47–54.
30.
Wołodkiewicz, W. (2009). Europa i prawo rzymskie. Szkice z historii europejskiej kultury prawnej, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, s. 292–293. ISBN 9788376018249.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-789X |
| ISSN: | 1734-2031 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
