PL EN
 
2/2017 vol. 33
Stats
CC BY-SA 4.0
Get citation
A state and the protection of its interests. Advocatus fisci vs State Treasury Solicitors’ Office
Bronisław Sitek 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
 
 
Publication date: 2017-06-30
 
 
JoMS 2017;33(2):49-60
 
Article (PDF)
References (30)
 
KEYWORDS
protection of the interests of the Treasury
Roman law
public law
advocate fisci
the State Treasury Solicitors’ Office
 
ABSTRACT
The modern concept of the state dates its roots to the beginning of the Renaissance. Created at that time, the concept of ‘the national interest’ realized the existence of a sphere of rights and interests of a particular country, which must be protected in a particular way. To this end, national bodies responsible for protecting the rights and interests of the state were established. Despite the different conception of the state, the origins of institutions dealing with the legal protection of interests and rights of the state can be found in the Roman institution advocates fisci. Even then, numerous provisions governing the organization and functioning of the institution arose. In Poland the institution which deals with this king of protection is the State Treasury Solicitors’ Office. The object of this elaboration is to identify similarities and differences between those two institutions.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Bałaban, A. (1988). Theorie moderner sozialistischer Verfassungen, [in:] Häberle P. (ed.), Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 37, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 13–34. ISBN 9783166454610.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Bolla-Kotek, von S. (1938). Die Entwicklung des Fiskus zum Privatrechtssubjekt mit Beiträge zur Lehre vom Aerarium, Prag: Roland Verlag. ISBN 3406006302.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Brunt, P.A. (1964). Procuratorial Jurisdiction, ‟Latomus”, No. 25, p. 461–489.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Brunt, P.A. (1966). The ‟fiscus” and its Development, The Journal of Roman Studies, No. 56, p. 75–91. ISSN 0075-4358.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Brzęk, W. (2006). Prokuratoria Generalna Skarbu Państwa – historia i stan dzisiejszy, „Journal of Modern Science” 1/2, s. 20–39. ISSN 1734-2031.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Chicca, G. (1964). Il fiscus e le attribuzioni del suo advocatus nell'ordinamento romano, [in:] ‟Revue Internationale Du Droit D’auteur Rida” No. 11, p. 141–149. ISSN 0035-3515.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Giuffré, V. (1976). Papiniano: tra tradizione ed innovazione, ‟Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt ANRW”, vol. II/15, p. 632–666.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Herrlich, S. (1872). De aerario et fisco Romanorum quaestiones, Berolini: Typis expressit Gustavus Lange.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Hirschfeld, O. (1905). Die kaiserlichen Verwaltungsbeamten bis auf Diocletian, Berlin: Weidmann (rist. 1963).
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Humbert, V. (1877). s.v. Advocatus fisci, [in:] Ch. Daremberg, E. Saglio (eds.), Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines, I, 1, Paris: Hachette, col. 90.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Izdebski, H. (1995). Historia myśli politycznej i prawnej, Warszawa: C.H. Beck. ISBN 8371100566.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Juros, H. (1998). Ochrona środowiska naturalnego a redefinicja państwa, [w:] R. Sobański (red.), Prawa człowieka w państwie ekologicznym, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Teologii Katolickiej, s. 68–69. ISBN 8370721168.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Kaser, M. (1965). Recensione a Provera, ‟Iura”, No. 1, p. 175–176.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Kieliszek, Z. (2010). Państwo sprawiedliwe według Immanuela Kanta, [w:] B. Kruszewska, P. Polaczuk, L. Świto (red.), Sprawiedliwość. Wybrane koncepcje, Olsztyn: Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego, s. 27–60. ISBN 9788362383047.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Lambrini, P. (1993). In tema di „advocatus fisci” nell’ordinamento Romano, ‟Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor SDHI”, No. 59, p. 325–336. ISSN 0191-2917.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Lopéz Melero, R., Plácido, D., Presedo, F. (1992). Historia universal. Edad Antigua. Grecia y Oriente Próximo, Barcelona: Rústica editorial. ISBN 9788431630911.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Millar, F. (1963). The fiscus in the First Two Centuries, ‟Journal of Roman Studies”, No. 53, p. 29–42. ISSN 0075-4358.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Mitteis, L. (1908). Römisches Privatrecht bis auf die Zeit Diokletians, I, Leipzig: Leipzig Duncker & Humbolt.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Nardi, E. (1937). I casi di indegnitànel diritto successorio romano, Milano: A. Giuffrè.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Petrucci, A. (2012). Corso di diritto pubblico Romano, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore. ISBN 9788834836026.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Pflaum, H.G. (1950). Les procurateurs équestres sous le haut-empire romaine, Paris: Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient, Adrien Maisonneuve.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Provera, V. (1964). La vindicatio caducorum. Contributo allo studio del processo fiscale romano, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Pugliese, G. (1948). Processo privato e processo pubblico. Contributo all’individuazione dei loro caratteri nella storia del diritto romano, Rivista di diritto 3(1948), p. 98–104. ISSN 1720-3694.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Puliatti, S. (1992). Il "De iure fisci" dei Callistrato e il processo fiscale in età severiana, Milano: A. Giuffrè. ISBN 9788814037344.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Raggi, L. (1964). La restitutio in integrum nel sistem cognitorio di valutazioni plurime della decisione giudiziale, ‟Annali Macerata”, No. 27, p. 243–282.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Sitek, B., Jurewicz, A. i in. (red.) (2011). Rzymskie prawo publiczne. Wybrane zagadnienia, Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski. ISBN 9788372997371.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Sobański, R. (1979). Kościół – prawo – zbawienie, Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Spagnuolo Vigorita, T. (1985). Praesente fisci patrono, [in:] Giuffrè A. (ed.) Sodalitas. Scritti in onore di Antonio Guarino, Volume 3, Napoli: Jovene, p. 1119–1130.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Wojciechowska Bianco, B. (1988). La concezione ciceroniana dello stato in Montaigne, ‟Quaderni”, No. 10, p. 47–54.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Wołodkiewicz, W. (2009). Europa i prawo rzymskie. Szkice z historii europejskiej kultury prawnej, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, s. 292–293. ISBN 9788376018249.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
De pollicitationibus. On the nature of unilateral public promises in Roman law
Predictability of judicial decisions and foundations of European law: legal security in Roman law beyond the subjection of the judge to the statute
Human age and its importance in roman commercial law
Roman law and principles of the constitution of the Roman Republic of 1849 in the scientific and European constitutional context. The roots of the crisis of constitutionalism
Non capitur, qui ius publicum sequitur
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2391-789X
ISSN:1734-2031
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top